include/net/netns/packet.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
There is no need to include <linux/rculist.h> here.
Prefer the less invasive <linux/types.h> which is needed for 'hlist_head'.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
Let see if build-bots agree with me!
Just declaring 'struct mutex' and 'struct hlist_head' would also be an
option.
It would remove the need of any include, but is more likely to break
something.
---
include/net/netns/packet.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netns/packet.h b/include/net/netns/packet.h
index aae69bb43cde..74750865df36 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/packet.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/packet.h
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
#ifndef __NETNS_PACKET_H__
#define __NETNS_PACKET_H__
-#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
struct netns_packet {
struct mutex sklist_lock;
--
2.34.1
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:49 PM Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > There is no need to include <linux/rculist.h> here. > > Prefer the less invasive <linux/types.h> which is needed for 'hlist_head'. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > --- > Let see if build-bots agree with me! > net/packet/af_packet.c does not explicitly include linux/rculist.h It might be provided by include/linux/netdevice.h, but I wonder if this is best practice. > Just declaring 'struct mutex' and 'struct hlist_head' would also be an > option. I do not get it, see [1] > It would remove the need of any include, but is more likely to break > something. I do not see why you are even trying this ? > --- > include/net/netns/packet.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/netns/packet.h b/include/net/netns/packet.h > index aae69bb43cde..74750865df36 100644 > --- a/include/net/netns/packet.h > +++ b/include/net/netns/packet.h > @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ > #ifndef __NETNS_PACKET_H__ > #define __NETNS_PACKET_H__ > > -#include <linux/rculist.h> > #include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > > struct netns_packet { > struct mutex sklist_lock; [1] Definition of 'struct mutex' is definitely needed here. > -- > 2.34.1 >
Le 05/12/2022 à 06:24, Eric Dumazet a écrit : > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:49 PM Christophe JAILLET > <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote: >> >> There is no need to include <linux/rculist.h> here. >> >> Prefer the less invasive <linux/types.h> which is needed for 'hlist_head'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> >> --- >> Let see if build-bots agree with me! >> > > net/packet/af_packet.c does not explicitly include linux/rculist.h > > It might be provided by include/linux/netdevice.h, but I wonder if > this is best practice. At least, it is not what I expect. My goal is to avoid some unneeded includes AND the related indirect needed includes that are buried somewhere in the dependency hell. I missed the one in af_packet.c I'll repost a v2 with the fix for af_packet.c (and double-check if some other are also needed) > >> Just declaring 'struct mutex' and 'struct hlist_head' would also be an >> option. > > I do not get it, see [1] Just forget about it. Requirement for: struct my_struct { struct another_struct x; and struct my_struct { struct another_struct *x; ~~~ are not the same, even if 'my_struct' is not used at all... (*ashamed *) CJ > >> It would remove the need of any include, but is more likely to break >> something. > > I do not see why you are even trying this ? > >> --- >> include/net/netns/packet.h | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/net/netns/packet.h b/include/net/netns/packet.h >> index aae69bb43cde..74750865df36 100644 >> --- a/include/net/netns/packet.h >> +++ b/include/net/netns/packet.h >> @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ >> #ifndef __NETNS_PACKET_H__ >> #define __NETNS_PACKET_H__ >> >> -#include <linux/rculist.h> >> #include <linux/mutex.h> >> +#include <linux/types.h> >> >> struct netns_packet { >> struct mutex sklist_lock; > > [1] Definition of 'struct mutex' is definitely needed here. > >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.