On 6/9/26 4:12 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> This odd collection of patches is aimed at fixing the non-standard ColdFire
> set of readX()/writeX() IO access functions. Instead switching to using the
> asm-generic definitions in include/asm-generic/io.h. The difficulty comes
> in trying not to break any drivers with this change.
>
> The implementation of the readX()/writeX() family of IO access functions
> is non-standard on ColdFire platforms. They either return big-endian (that
> is native endian) data, or on platforms with PCI bus support check the
> supplied address and return either big or little endian data based on that
> check. This is non-standard, they are expected to always return
> little-endian byte ordered data. Unfortunately this behavior also means
> that ioreadX()/iowroteX() and their big-endian counter parts
> ioreadXbe()/iowriteXbe() are currently broken because they are implemented
> using the readX()/writeX() functions.
>
> Patches 1, 2 and 3 in this series are specific driver changes that can be
> made independently of the final ColdFire readX()/writeX() change.
>
> Patch 4 is the actual switch to ColdFire building using asm-generic
> readX()/writeX(), but also contains three driver fixes that are not easily
> handled independently.
>
> Note that I don't have access to all supported hardware needed to fully
> test all these changes. I have tested what I have, a bunch of the standard
> Freescale ColdFire eval boards, and inspected generated code for differences.
>
> Note also that patch 3 relies on changes that are currently only in
> linux-next, and are scheduled to hit mainline during the next v7.2
> merge window. Those changes are also available in an immutable git tree
> at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gerg/m68knommu.git
> cf-internal-io branch.
I understand that with this series you are targeting the m68K tree, am I
correct?
A possibly better option would be, after that the pre-req patches land
into Linus's tree, to share an immutable branch for this series, so that
both m68k and net-next could pull it.
/P