drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c | 38 ++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
From: David Holland <david@cardinalsystem.net>
The Linux kernel coding style guidelines prohibit the use of CamelCase
variable names. All variables should be snakecase.
Rename the 'ChipVersion' parameter to 'chip_version' and the
'AutoLoadFail' parameter to 'auto_load_fail' in hal_com.c to adhere to
the standard snakecase naming convention.
Signed-off-by: David Holland <david@cardinalsystem.net>
---
Hey everyone,
This is my first attempt at submitting a patch into the Linux kernel. I always wanted to try to get my own patch submitted into the kernel so I was scrolling through the codebase and found some incorrect naming styles. I corrected the variables name that were using camelCase to use the traditional snakecase.
Thanks for reviewing,
David
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c | 38 ++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
index 31b3e880ae6a..4bee338073c4 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com.c
@@ -31,44 +31,44 @@ void rtw_hal_data_deinit(struct adapter *padapter)
}
-void dump_chip_info(struct hal_version ChipVersion)
+void dump_chip_info(struct hal_version chip_version)
{
char buf[128];
size_t cnt = 0;
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "Chip Version Info: CHIP_8723B_%s_",
- IS_NORMAL_CHIP(ChipVersion) ? "Normal_Chip" : "Test_Chip");
+ IS_NORMAL_CHIP(chip_version) ? "Normal_Chip" : "Test_Chip");
- if (IS_CHIP_VENDOR_TSMC(ChipVersion))
+ if (IS_CHIP_VENDOR_TSMC(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "TSMC_");
- else if (IS_CHIP_VENDOR_UMC(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_CHIP_VENDOR_UMC(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "UMC_");
- else if (IS_CHIP_VENDOR_SMIC(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_CHIP_VENDOR_SMIC(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "SMIC_");
- if (IS_A_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ if (IS_A_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "A_CUT_");
- else if (IS_B_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_B_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "B_CUT_");
- else if (IS_C_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_C_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "C_CUT_");
- else if (IS_D_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_D_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "D_CUT_");
- else if (IS_E_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_E_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "E_CUT_");
- else if (IS_I_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_I_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "I_CUT_");
- else if (IS_J_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_J_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "J_CUT_");
- else if (IS_K_CUT(ChipVersion))
+ else if (IS_K_CUT(chip_version))
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "K_CUT_");
else
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt,
- "UNKNOWN_CUT(%d)_", ChipVersion.CUTVersion);
+ "UNKNOWN_CUT(%d)_", chip_version.CUTVersion);
cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "1T1R_");
- cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "RomVer(%d)\n", ChipVersion.ROMVer);
+ cnt += scnprintf(buf + cnt, sizeof(buf) - cnt, "RomVer(%d)\n", chip_version.ROMVer);
}
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void dump_chip_info(struct hal_version ChipVersion)
* BIT[6:0] Channel Plan
*sw_channel_plan channel plan from SW (registry/module param)
*def_channel_plan channel plan used when HW/SW both invalid
- *AutoLoadFail efuse autoload fail or not
+ *auto_load_fail efuse autoload fail or not
*
* Return:
*Final channel plan decision
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ u8 hal_com_config_channel_plan(
u8 hw_channel_plan,
u8 sw_channel_plan,
u8 def_channel_plan,
- bool AutoLoadFail
+ bool auto_load_fail
)
{
struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ u8 hal_com_config_channel_plan(
chnlPlan = def_channel_plan;
if (0xFF == hw_channel_plan)
- AutoLoadFail = true;
+ auto_load_fail = true;
- if (!AutoLoadFail) {
+ if (!auto_load_fail) {
u8 hw_chnlPlan;
hw_chnlPlan = hw_channel_plan & (~EEPROM_CHANNEL_PLAN_BY_HW_MASK);
--
2.53.0
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
On Fri Mar 27, 2026 at 3:36 PM CDT, david wrote: > From: David Holland <david@cardinalsystem.net> > > The Linux kernel coding style guidelines prohibit the use of CamelCase > variable names. All variables should be snakecase. > > Rename the 'ChipVersion' parameter to 'chip_version' and the > 'AutoLoadFail' parameter to 'auto_load_fail' in hal_com.c to adhere to > the standard snakecase naming convention. > > Signed-off-by: David Holland <david@cardinalsystem.net> > --- ... > > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void dump_chip_info(struct hal_version ChipVersion) > * BIT[6:0] Channel Plan > *sw_channel_plan channel plan from SW (registry/module param) > *def_channel_plan channel plan used when HW/SW both invalid > - *AutoLoadFail efuse autoload fail or not > + *auto_load_fail efuse autoload fail or not I think the whitespace here was intentional (although I can't tell why they did it like this), originally the comments starting with channel and efuse lined up and this changes it. Thanks, ET
on Fri, 27 Mar 2026 16:36:36 -0400, David Holland wrote: > From: David Holland <david@cardinalsystem.net> You don't need that. > The Linux kernel coding style guidelines prohibit the use of CamelCase > variable names. All variables should be snakecase. > > Rename the 'ChipVersion' parameter to 'chip_version' and the > 'AutoLoadFail' parameter to 'auto_load_fail' in hal_com.c to adhere to > the standard snakecase naming convention. > > Signed-off-by: David Holland <david@cardinalsystem.net> > --- > > Hey everyone, > > This is my first attempt at submitting a patch into the Linux kernel. I always wanted to try to get my own patch submitted into the kernel so I was scrolling through the codebase and found some incorrect naming styles. I corrected the variables name that were using camelCase to use the traditional snakecase. > > Thanks for reviewing, > David Wrap your lines, please. Thanks, Bera
On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 09:43:34AM +0300, Bera Yüzlü wrote: > on Fri, 27 Mar 2026 16:36:36 -0400, David Holland wrote: > > From: David Holland <david@cardinalsystem.net> > > You don't need that. But it is fine to use, that is not an issue to complain about here :) thanks, greg k-h
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.