[PATCH v2] ASoC: sma1307: fix double free of devm_kzalloc() memory

Guangshuo Li posted 1 patch 3 weeks, 4 days ago
sound/soc/codecs/sma1307.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH v2] ASoC: sma1307: fix double free of devm_kzalloc() memory
Posted by Guangshuo Li 3 weeks, 4 days ago
A previous change added NULL checks and cleanup for allocation
failures in sma1307_setting_loaded().

However, the cleanup for mode_set entries is wrong. Those entries are
allocated with devm_kzalloc(), so they are device-managed resources and
must not be freed with kfree(). Manually freeing them in the error path
can lead to a double free when devres later releases the same memory.

Drop the manual kfree() loop and let devres handle the cleanup.

Fixes: 0ec6bd16705fe ("ASoC: sma1307: Add NULL check in sma1307_setting_loaded()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
---
v2:
  - Replace kfree() with devm_kfree() for mode_set[] error cleanup.
  - Clear released mode_set[] pointers after devm_kfree().

 sound/soc/codecs/sma1307.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/sma1307.c b/sound/soc/codecs/sma1307.c
index 4bb59e5c0891..5850bf6e71ca 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/sma1307.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/sma1307.c
@@ -1759,8 +1759,10 @@ static void sma1307_setting_loaded(struct sma1307_priv *sma1307, const char *fil
 				   sma1307->set.mode_size * 2 * sizeof(int),
 				   GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!sma1307->set.mode_set[i]) {
-			for (int j = 0; j < i; j++)
-				kfree(sma1307->set.mode_set[j]);
+			for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
+				devm_kfree(sma1307->dev, sma1307->set.mode_set[j]);
+				sma1307->set.mode_set[j] = NULL;
+			}
 			sma1307->set.status = false;
 			return;
 		}
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: sma1307: fix double free of devm_kzalloc() memory
Posted by Mark Brown 3 weeks ago
On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:06:11 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> A previous change added NULL checks and cleanup for allocation
> failures in sma1307_setting_loaded().
> 
> However, the cleanup for mode_set entries is wrong. Those entries are
> allocated with devm_kzalloc(), so they are device-managed resources and
> must not be freed with kfree(). Manually freeing them in the error path
> can lead to a double free when devres later releases the same memory.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: sma1307: fix double free of devm_kzalloc() memory
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/misc/c/fe757092d232

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark
Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: sma1307: fix double free of devm_kzalloc() memory
Posted by Mark Brown 3 weeks, 1 day ago
On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:06:11 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> ASoC: sma1307: fix double free of devm_kzalloc() memory

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-7.0

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: sma1307: fix double free of devm_kzalloc() memory
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/fe757092d232

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark