[PATCH v19 1/4] drm/msm/dpu: Extract plane splitting into a dedicated function

Jun Nie posted 4 patches 3 weeks ago
[PATCH v19 1/4] drm/msm/dpu: Extract plane splitting into a dedicated function
Posted by Jun Nie 3 weeks ago
dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp() currently handles both plane
validation and plane splitting. For better simplicity and to
facilitate future refactoring, move the splitting logic into
its own dedicated function.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
index 9b7a8b46bfa91..4ed14f203c315 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
@@ -821,13 +821,8 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 {
 	int i, ret = 0, min_scale, max_scale;
 	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
-	struct dpu_kms *kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(&pdpu->base);
-	u64 max_mdp_clk_rate = kms->perf.max_core_clk_rate;
 	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
-	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
 	struct drm_rect fb_rect = { 0 };
-	uint32_t max_linewidth;
 
 	min_scale = FRAC_16_16(1, MAX_UPSCALE_RATIO);
 	max_scale = MAX_DOWNSCALE_RATIO << 16;
@@ -850,14 +845,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	/* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
-	pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
-	r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
-	/* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
-	drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
-
-	pipe_cfg->dst_rect = new_plane_state->dst;
-
 	fb_rect.x2 = new_plane_state->fb->width;
 	fb_rect.y2 = new_plane_state->fb->height;
 
@@ -879,6 +866,31 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		if (pstate->layout.plane_pitch[i] > DPU_SSPP_MAX_PITCH_SIZE)
 			return -E2BIG;
 
+	pstate->needs_qos_remap = drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int dpu_plane_split(struct drm_plane *plane,
+			   struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state,
+			   const struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
+	struct dpu_kms *kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(&pdpu->base);
+	u64 max_mdp_clk_rate = kms->perf.max_core_clk_rate;
+	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
+	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
+	uint32_t max_linewidth;
+
+	/* move the assignment here, to ease handling to another pairs later */
+	pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
+	r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
+	/* state->src is 16.16, src_rect is not */
+	drm_rect_fp_to_int(&pipe_cfg->src_rect, &new_plane_state->src);
+
+	pipe_cfg->dst_rect = new_plane_state->dst;
+
 	max_linewidth = pdpu->catalog->caps->max_linewidth;
 
 	drm_rect_rotate(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
@@ -910,8 +922,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nosspp(struct drm_plane *plane,
 				    new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
 				    new_plane_state->rotation);
 
-	pstate->needs_qos_remap = drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1132,6 +1142,10 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	if (!new_plane_state->visible)
 		return 0;
 
+	ret = dpu_plane_split(plane, new_plane_state, crtc_state);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (!dpu_plane_try_multirect_parallel(pipe, pipe_cfg, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg,
 					      pipe->sspp,
 					      msm_framebuffer_format(new_plane_state->fb),
@@ -1180,6 +1194,10 @@ static int dpu_plane_virtual_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	ret = dpu_plane_split(plane, plane_state, crtc_state);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/*
 	 * Force resource reallocation if the format of FB or src/dst have
 	 * changed. We might need to allocate different SSPP or SSPPs for this

-- 
2.43.0