The spinlock_t and struct mutex members in struct gb_tty lack
comments describing what they protect, which is required by the
kernel coding style.

Also fix the alignment of the wait_for_completion_timeout() call
in gb_uart_wait_for_all_credits() to match the open parenthesis.

Signed-off-by: Rahul Joshi <rj5547884@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
index 7d060b4cd33d..52a84a68049c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
@@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ struct gb_tty {
 	unsigned int minor;
 	unsigned char clocal;
 	bool disconnected;
-	spinlock_t read_lock;
-	spinlock_t write_lock;
+	spinlock_t read_lock;	/* protects iocount and oldcount */
+	spinlock_t write_lock;	/* protects write_fifo and credits */
 	struct async_icount iocount;
 	struct async_icount oldcount;
 	wait_queue_head_t wioctl;
-	struct mutex mutex;
+	struct mutex mutex;	/* protects disconnected flag and device state */
 	u8 ctrlin;	/* input control lines */
 	u8 ctrlout;	/* output control lines */
 	struct gb_uart_set_line_coding_request line_coding;
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int gb_uart_wait_for_all_credits(struct gb_tty *gb_tty)
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gb_tty->credits_complete,
-			msecs_to_jiffies(GB_UART_CREDIT_WAIT_TIMEOUT_MSEC));
+					  msecs_to_jiffies(GB_UART_CREDIT_WAIT_TIMEOUT_MSEC));
 	if (!ret) {
 		dev_err(&gb_tty->gbphy_dev->dev,
 			"time out waiting for credits\n");
-- 
2.34.1

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:11:04AM +0530, Rahul Joshi wrote:
> The spinlock_t and struct mutex members in struct gb_tty lack
> comments describing what they protect, which is required by the
> kernel coding style.
> 
> Also fix the alignment of the wait_for_completion_timeout() call
> in gb_uart_wait_for_all_credits() to match the open parenthesis.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Joshi <rj5547884@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
> index 7d060b4cd33d..52a84a68049c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
> @@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ struct gb_tty {
>  	unsigned int minor;
>  	unsigned char clocal;
>  	bool disconnected;
> -	spinlock_t read_lock;
> -	spinlock_t write_lock;
> +	spinlock_t read_lock;	/* protects iocount and oldcount */
> +	spinlock_t write_lock;	/* protects write_fifo and credits */


https://lore.kernel.org/all/aaFdxqxEUzZFVIqQ@stanley.mountain/

How on earth could you have come up with the exact same words here
that someone else did?  It feels like too large of a coincidence.

regards,
dan carpenter

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:11:04AM +0530, Rahul Joshi wrote:
> The spinlock_t and struct mutex members in struct gb_tty lack
> comments describing what they protect, which is required by the
> kernel coding style.
> 
> Also fix the alignment of the wait_for_completion_timeout() call
> in gb_uart_wait_for_all_credits() to match the open parenthesis.

Each patch can only do 1 thing, when you say "Also" that's a huge hint
that something should be split up.

But, in this case, all of these changes have been rejected previously,
see the mailing list archives for details.

thanks,

greg k-h