The function indx_find_sort() incorrectly uses kfree(n) to cleanup the
'struct indx_node' instance in error paths.

The 'struct indx_node' is a container that manages internal allocations
(n->index) and holds a reference to a buffer head (n->nb). Using kfree()
directly on the node pointer only frees the container itself, resulting
in a memory leak of the index buffer and a resource leak of the buffer
head reference.

This patch replaces the incorrect kfree(n) calls with the specialized
helper put_indx_node(n), which correctly releases the internal resources
and the buffer head, consistent with other functions like indx_find_raw().

Fixes: 82cae269cfa9 ("fs/ntfs3: Add initialization of super block")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
---
Changelog:

v1 -> v2:

1. Add a Fixes tag.
---
 fs/ntfs3/index.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/index.c b/fs/ntfs3/index.c
index 7157cfd70fdc..c598b4b2f454 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs3/index.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/index.c
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ int indx_find_sort(struct ntfs_index *indx, struct ntfs_inode *ni,
 		    sizeof(struct NTFS_DE) + sizeof(u64)) {
 			if (n) {
 				fnd_pop(fnd);
-				kfree(n);
+				put_indx_node(n);
 			}
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ int indx_find_sort(struct ntfs_index *indx, struct ntfs_inode *ni,
 		/* Try next level. */
 		e = hdr_first_de(&n->index->ihdr);
 		if (!e) {
-			kfree(n);
+			put_indx_node(n);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ int indx_find_sort(struct ntfs_index *indx, struct ntfs_inode *ni,
 		/* Pop one level. */
 		if (n) {
 			fnd_pop(fnd);
-			kfree(n);
+			put_indx_node(n);
 		}
 
 		level = fnd->level;
-- 
2.25.1

…

> This patch replaces the incorrect kfree(n) calls …

Thanks for another contribution.

* Under which circumstances would you take the usage of imperative mood
  better into account for an improved change description?
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.19-rc5#n94

* Can it be helpful to append parentheses to function names
  (also in the summary phrase)?


Regards,
Markus

On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 06:57:36PM +0000, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> The function indx_find_sort() incorrectly uses kfree(n) to cleanup the
> 'struct indx_node' instance in error paths.
> 
> The 'struct indx_node' is a container that manages internal allocations
> (n->index) and holds a reference to a buffer head (n->nb). Using kfree()
> directly on the node pointer only frees the container itself, resulting
> in a memory leak of the index buffer and a resource leak of the buffer
> head reference.
> 
> This patch replaces the incorrect kfree(n) calls with the specialized
> helper put_indx_node(n), which correctly releases the internal resources
> and the buffer head, consistent with other functions like indx_find_raw().
> 
> Fixes: 82cae269cfa9 ("fs/ntfs3: Add initialization of super block")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 
> 1. Add a Fixes tag.
> ---
>  fs/ntfs3/index.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/index.c b/fs/ntfs3/index.c
> index 7157cfd70fdc..c598b4b2f454 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/index.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/index.c
> @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ int indx_find_sort(struct ntfs_index *indx, struct ntfs_inode *ni,
>  		    sizeof(struct NTFS_DE) + sizeof(u64)) {
>  			if (n) {
>  				fnd_pop(fnd);
> -				kfree(n);
> +				put_indx_node(n);
>  			}
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ int indx_find_sort(struct ntfs_index *indx, struct ntfs_inode *ni,
>  		/* Try next level. */
>  		e = hdr_first_de(&n->index->ihdr);
>  		if (!e) {
> -			kfree(n);
> +			put_indx_node(n);
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ int indx_find_sort(struct ntfs_index *indx, struct ntfs_inode *ni,
>  		/* Pop one level. */
>  		if (n) {
>  			fnd_pop(fnd);
> -			kfree(n);
> +			put_indx_node(n);
>  		}
>  
>  		level = fnd->level;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>