drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Hi all,
After merging the drivers-x86 tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c: In function 'display_damage':
drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c:11134:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
11134 | port_status = FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS, dmg_status);
| ^~~~~~~~~
Caused by commits
f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardware damage detection capability.")
520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details of damaged device.")
and probably exposed by commit
5523dcfa4f59 ("Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in FORTIFY_REASON defines")
from the kspp tree which removed the include of bitfield.h from
fortify-string.h. I wonder if this will affect any other (more exotic)
builds?
I have applied the following patch for today, and this (or something
like it) should probably be applied to the drivers-x86 tree.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:17:35 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in
FORTIFY_REASON defines"
interacting with commits
f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardware dam
age detection capability.")
520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details of da
maged device.")
from the drivers-x86 tree.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
index 95755fa1e008..a272f27e6227 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/backlight.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
--
2.52.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, 15 Jan 2026, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the drivers-x86 tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c: In function 'display_damage':
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c:11134:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 11134 | port_status = FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS, dmg_status);
> | ^~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commits
>
> f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardware damage detection capability.")
> 520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details of damaged device.")
>
> and probably exposed by commit
>
> 5523dcfa4f59 ("Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in FORTIFY_REASON defines")
>
> from the kspp tree which removed the include of bitfield.h from
> fortify-string.h. I wonder if this will affect any other (more exotic)
> builds?
>
> I have applied the following patch for today, and this (or something
> like it) should probably be applied to the drivers-x86 tree.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:17:35 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in
> FORTIFY_REASON defines"
>
> interacting with commits
>
> f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardware dam
> age detection capability.")
> 520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details of da
> maged device.")
>
> from the drivers-x86 tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 95755fa1e008..a272f27e6227 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/backlight.h>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/dmi.h>
Thanks Stephen.
I've folded this into the original change.
I do try to pay attention to lack of these headers during review in an
attempt to avoid problems like this but seem to have missed it in this
case.
--
i.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 02:52:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drivers-x86 tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c: In function 'display_damage':
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c:11134:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 11134 | port_status = FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS, dmg_status);
> | ^~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commits
>
> f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardware damage detection capability.")
> 520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details of damaged device.")
>
> and probably exposed by commit
>
> 5523dcfa4f59 ("Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in FORTIFY_REASON defines")
>
> from the kspp tree which removed the include of bitfield.h from
> fortify-string.h. I wonder if this will affect any other (more exotic)
> builds?
>
> I have applied the following patch for today, and this (or something
> like it) should probably be applied to the drivers-x86 tree.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:17:35 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in
> FORTIFY_REASON defines"
>
> interacting with commits
>
> f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardware dam
> age detection capability.")
> 520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details of da
> maged device.")
>
> from the drivers-x86 tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 95755fa1e008..a272f27e6227 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/backlight.h>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/dmi.h>
Ah! Thanks -- this looks correct to me.
I will run some randconfigs to see if anything pops out.
--
Kees Cook
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.