From nobody Sun Feb 8 06:21:52 2026 Received: from mail.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D44028750C; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 03:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768449172; cv=none; b=hCtV/N/sD5QpZIE1DyO4QFrIYZqLWTJavh9HAT25wkqKrzvEvhRFSCZkRu5WCHsILQVkSXYqRWtGybCkOry0K7mQHaici+X1ebgpz7pwydgasDJ5aO4yZzCD+zfL5zbFAmDFwwPLLXWit6VMjWQxVyIjmHQunaTCEpk7ohWO7WM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768449172; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DV9uqIbYP7j9t6ORDNcYgulbCs+2dnUlOBhhusC3wcE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=exGk0DMvnWO/3ejZ4ZIweizYH5ENfEEkegzrRS9rkka9S8fbyAW/bflnt6qAlHlbqBrmmRT94Ata/l4DJFIHhOym31IElZ8w8srxu5m+Bg3sr/yYkbsSPIcvBqUMUPeSkv1ToMaHAV4iksQlUhl+tdeW3506ul2M9owtceoSdtU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b=Zb8q6vCh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="Zb8q6vCh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=202503; t=1768449166; bh=3qU6zmkqRVkas3uM2tuPqkdq9bfxDWNJwIb4+QUZ/Yk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=Zb8q6vChT9rhAmJlcLS9xExr15n6WGgmYGYfYCSvopAxJR/GKRHQ4WG2xBE7KuRLo qYQO5eWSR0Ec6R7jj4aSoYryK3rudKCMx71IoV/OkwiwPRsQUaFVqQV3M7NUqtvKaF XBFFojLVs5uyHND9wOVC3cIIj2FVZbN5WFhZZC7qOA2eQBtm6plHKNcOb4rGMSzxYH 6U6SezCN2YVtlr4yJtQB1FpaOxTabvY5pu8mSK6CsuLWFCWQfUIQq3Hz1gbohPsH0H dOUj0BO3wfLAgxugNqAH7S1/YMUace2VLl/xsebb9/yvraoQ4ARBXWOb/8vtR8fO5h DLPSO2jc2+3tQ== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange secp256r1 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ds8Fn4Lt7z4wCP; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:52:45 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:52:44 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Hans de Goede , Mark Gross , Kees Cook Cc: Ilpo =?UTF-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= , Nitin Joshi , David Laight , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree Message-ID: <20260115145244.3836c369@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/WtkSe6DkCDdqolk5hJkBY_z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/WtkSe6DkCDdqolk5hJkBY_z Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, After merging the drivers-x86 tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c: In function 'display_damage': drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c:11134:23: error: implicit decla= ration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 11134 | port_status =3D FIELD_GET(PORT_STATUS, dmg_status); | ^~~~~~~~~ Caused by commits f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardwar= e damage detection capability.") 520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details = of damaged device.") and probably exposed by commit 5523dcfa4f59 ("Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in FORTIFY_REASO= N defines") from the kspp tree which removed the include of bitfield.h from fortify-string.h. I wonder if this will affect any other (more exotic) builds? I have applied the following patch for today, and this (or something like it) should probably be applied to the drivers-x86 tree. From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:17:35 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "Fortify: Use C arithmetic not FIELD_xxx() in FORTIFY_REASON defines" interacting with commits f6b6ce566954 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add support to detect hardwar= e dam age detection capability.") 520448bb6f09 ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add sysfs to display details = of da maged device.") from the drivers-x86 tree. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell --- drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform= /x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c index 95755fa1e008..a272f27e6227 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/thinkpad_acpi.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ =20 #include #include +#include #include #include #include --=20 2.52.0 --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/WtkSe6DkCDdqolk5hJkBY_z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmloZIwACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gwp0wf6A1nXpdIE43CutXP2GOhoWXbOuV5EI6kbvZ9ZKspk5kZjtYfCUa9WqTTq wP+V/y8Upk5OiswH6+P18VSX4+6YRFfDUXDCmjKVeryXLsWfJktmiofCgpm2/fDg vRwolDCKDCFIFKUUiv/d1sG5a+AQKal3lOPegTujVt8hpi+9hDvlGnB9ySE4w2yi OX9qGi0/A16iYP9PHCNUcfzkEB3AFy9DigHJc9rmChzW0p2YVI5wG9xfFX6AW+8R +TjJIswb8FccTbDuu7HYFvB6Vtlj3kkb5mfkZv9kCZMklDARK4tmyREyzt+UVLgA lgCNDPEn2ahz3lyNHZEKkbntkJ/f4A== =uzT3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/WtkSe6DkCDdqolk5hJkBY_z--