fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
In do_allocation_zoned(), the code acquires space_info->lock before
block_group->lock. However, the critical section does not access or
modify any members of the space_info structure. Thus, the lock is
redundant as it provides no necessary synchronization here.
This change simplifies the locking logic and aligns the function with
other zoned paths, such as __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned(), which only
rely on block_group->lock. Since the 'space_info' local variable is
no longer used after removing the lock calls, it is also removed.
Removing this unnecessary lock reduces contention on the global
space_info lock, improving concurrency in the zoned allocation path.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com>
---
Changelog:
v2 -> v3:
1. Removed the description about the 'space_info->lock' in the comment block above do_allocation_zoned().
v1 -> v2:
1. Removed the description about avoiding deadlocks.
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index e4cae34620d1..36b06ee47c1a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3824,9 +3824,8 @@ static int do_allocation_clustered(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
* Lock nesting
* ============
*
- * space_info::lock
- * block_group::lock
- * fs_info::treelog_bg_lock
+ * block_group::lock
+ * fs_info::treelog_bg_lock
*/
/*
@@ -3839,7 +3838,6 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
struct btrfs_block_group **bg_ret)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
- struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = block_group->space_info;
struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl = block_group->free_space_ctl;
u64 start = block_group->start;
u64 num_bytes = ffe_ctl->num_bytes;
@@ -3900,7 +3898,6 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
*/
}
- spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
spin_lock(&fs_info->treelog_bg_lock);
spin_lock(&fs_info->relocation_bg_lock);
@@ -4002,7 +3999,6 @@ static int do_allocation_zoned(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
spin_unlock(&fs_info->relocation_bg_lock);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->treelog_bg_lock);
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
- spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 02:44:50PM +0000, Jiasheng Jiang wrote: > In do_allocation_zoned(), the code acquires space_info->lock before > block_group->lock. However, the critical section does not access or > modify any members of the space_info structure. Thus, the lock is > redundant as it provides no necessary synchronization here. > > This change simplifies the locking logic and aligns the function with > other zoned paths, such as __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned(), which only > rely on block_group->lock. Since the 'space_info' local variable is > no longer used after removing the lock calls, it is also removed. > > Removing this unnecessary lock reduces contention on the global > space_info lock, improving concurrency in the zoned allocation path. > > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@gmail.com> Added to for-next, thanks.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.