[PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: clocksource: Fix stimecmp update hazard on RV32

Naohiko Shimizu posted 3 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
[PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: clocksource: Fix stimecmp update hazard on RV32
Posted by Naohiko Shimizu 1 month, 1 week ago
Signed-off-by: Naohiko Shimizu <naohiko.shimizu@gmail.com>

riscv: fix timer register update hazard on RV32

On RV32, updating the 64-bit stimecmp (or vstimecmp) CSR requires two
separate 32-bit writes. A race condition exists if the timer triggers
during these two writes.

The RISC-V Privileged Specification (e.g., Section 3.2.1 for mtimecmp)
recommends a specific 3-step sequence to avoid spurious interrupts
when updating 64-bit comparison registers on 32-bit systems:

1. Set the low-order bits (stimecmp) to all ones (ULONG_MAX).
2. Set the high-order bits (stimecmph) to the desired value.
3. Set the low-order bits (stimecmp) to the desired value.

Current implementation writes the LSB first without ensuring a future
value, which may lead to a transient state where the 64-bit comparison
is incorrectly evaluated as "expired" by the hardware. This results in
spurious timer interrupts.

This patch adopts the spec-recommended 3-step sequence to ensure the
intermediate 64-bit state is never smaller than the current time.
---
 drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
index 4d7cf338824a..cfc4d83c42c0 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
@@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ static int riscv_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
 
 	if (static_branch_likely(&riscv_sstc_available)) {
 #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
-		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval & 0xFFFFFFFF);
+		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, ULONG_MAX);
 		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMPH, next_tval >> 32);
+		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval & 0xFFFFFFFF);
 #else
 		csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval);
 #endif
-- 
2.39.5
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: clocksource: Fix stimecmp update hazard on RV32
Posted by Anup Patel 1 month ago
On Sat, Jan 3, 2026 at 8:54 PM Naohiko Shimizu
<naohiko.shimizu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Naohiko Shimizu <naohiko.shimizu@gmail.com>
>
> riscv: fix timer register update hazard on RV32

Drop this line since it look similar to patch subject.

>
> On RV32, updating the 64-bit stimecmp (or vstimecmp) CSR requires two
> separate 32-bit writes. A race condition exists if the timer triggers
> during these two writes.
>
> The RISC-V Privileged Specification (e.g., Section 3.2.1 for mtimecmp)
> recommends a specific 3-step sequence to avoid spurious interrupts
> when updating 64-bit comparison registers on 32-bit systems:
>
> 1. Set the low-order bits (stimecmp) to all ones (ULONG_MAX).
> 2. Set the high-order bits (stimecmph) to the desired value.
> 3. Set the low-order bits (stimecmp) to the desired value.
>
> Current implementation writes the LSB first without ensuring a future
> value, which may lead to a transient state where the 64-bit comparison
> is incorrectly evaluated as "expired" by the hardware. This results in
> spurious timer interrupts.
>
> This patch adopts the spec-recommended 3-step sequence to ensure the
> intermediate 64-bit state is never smaller than the current time.

Need Signed-off-by and Fixes tag over here in all three patches.

Regards,
Anup

> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> index 4d7cf338824a..cfc4d83c42c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c
> @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ static int riscv_clock_next_event(unsigned long delta,
>
>         if (static_branch_likely(&riscv_sstc_available)) {
>  #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> -               csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval & 0xFFFFFFFF);
> +               csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, ULONG_MAX);
>                 csr_write(CSR_STIMECMPH, next_tval >> 32);
> +               csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval & 0xFFFFFFFF);
>  #else
>                 csr_write(CSR_STIMECMP, next_tval);
>  #endif
> --
> 2.39.5
>