drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
We know the address of the underlying remote software node referenced by
the GPIO property (if it is a software node). We don't need to compare
its name, we can compare its address which is more precise anyway.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
index b44f35d684590..54bad9e88fe5c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c
@@ -18,19 +18,18 @@
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/property.h>
#include "gpiolib.h"
#include "gpiolib-swnode.h"
-#define GPIOLIB_SWNODE_UNDEFINED_NAME "swnode-gpio-undefined"
-
static struct gpio_device *swnode_get_gpio_device(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
{
const struct software_node *gdev_node;
struct gpio_device *gdev;
gdev_node = to_software_node(fwnode);
- if (!gdev_node || !gdev_node->name)
+ if (!gdev_node)
goto fwnode_lookup;
/*
@@ -38,7 +37,7 @@ static struct gpio_device *swnode_get_gpio_device(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
* primarily used as a key for internal chip selects in SPI bindings.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIO_SWNODE_UNDEFINED) &&
- !strcmp(gdev_node->name, GPIOLIB_SWNODE_UNDEFINED_NAME))
+ gdev_node == &swnode_gpio_undefined)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
fwnode_lookup:
@@ -139,9 +138,7 @@ int swnode_gpio_count(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *con_id)
* A special node that identifies undefined GPIOs, this is primarily used as
* a key for internal chip selects in SPI bindings.
*/
-const struct software_node swnode_gpio_undefined = {
- .name = GPIOLIB_SWNODE_UNDEFINED_NAME,
-};
+const struct software_node swnode_gpio_undefined = { };
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(swnode_gpio_undefined, "GPIO_SWNODE");
static int __init swnode_gpio_init(void)
--
2.51.0
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 04:46:24PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> We know the address of the underlying remote software node referenced by
> the GPIO property (if it is a software node). We don't need to compare
> its name, we can compare its address which is more precise anyway.
...
> -const struct software_node swnode_gpio_undefined = {
> - .name = GPIOLIB_SWNODE_UNDEFINED_NAME,
> -};
> +const struct software_node swnode_gpio_undefined = { };
This will remove the name from sysfs, which may be informative.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:46:24 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> We know the address of the underlying remote software node referenced by
> the GPIO property (if it is a software node). We don't need to compare
> its name, we can compare its address which is more precise anyway.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] gpio: swnode: compare the "undefined" swnode by its address, not name
commit: 6774a66d0e103d0e3e4c0f37dbd61946ec83edf0
Best regards,
--
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 12:27:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:46:24 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > We know the address of the underlying remote software node referenced by > > the GPIO property (if it is a software node). We don't need to compare > > its name, we can compare its address which is more precise anyway. > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/1] gpio: swnode: compare the "undefined" swnode by its address, not name > commit: 6774a66d0e103d0e3e4c0f37dbd61946ec83edf0 Okay, but still consider returning the name. The idea of comparing with the address I agree with. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 04:46:24PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > We know the address of the underlying remote software node referenced by > the GPIO property (if it is a software node). We don't need to compare > its name, we can compare its address which is more precise anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Thanks, Charles
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.