drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
We always call superio_enter() in it87_gpio_direction_out() but only
call superio_exit() if the call to it87_gpio_set() succeeds. Move the
label to balance the calls in error path as well.
Fixes: ef877a159072 ("gpio: it87: use new line value setter callbacks")
Reported-by: Daniel Gibson <daniel@gibson.sh>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bd0a00e3-9b8c-43e8-8772-e67b91f4c71e@gibson.sh/
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
index 5d677bcfccf2..528ac1890613 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
@@ -254,9 +254,8 @@ static int it87_gpio_direction_out(struct gpio_chip *chip,
if (rc)
goto exit;
- superio_exit();
-
exit:
+ superio_exit();
spin_unlock(&it87_gpio->lock);
return rc;
}
--
2.51.0
On 12/9/25 07:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> We always call superio_enter() in it87_gpio_direction_out() but only
> call superio_exit() if the call to it87_gpio_set() succeeds. Move the
> label to balance the calls in error path as well.
>
> Fixes: ef877a159072 ("gpio: it87: use new line value setter callbacks")
> Reported-by: Daniel Gibson <daniel@gibson.sh>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bd0a00e3-9b8c-43e8-8772-e67b91f4c71e@gibson.sh/
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> index 5d677bcfccf2..528ac1890613 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> @@ -254,9 +254,8 @@ static int it87_gpio_direction_out(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> if (rc)
> goto exit;
>
> - superio_exit();
> -
> exit:
> + superio_exit();
> spin_unlock(&it87_gpio->lock);
> return rc;
> }
Moving this after exit: means that superio_exit() is also called if
superio_enter() failed, a few lines above this patch:
rc = superio_enter();
if (rc)
goto exit;
I don't know if this is really wrong, but it looks fishy and this code
behaved differently for years - in contrast to the change to skip
superio_exit() if it87_gpio_set() failed, which is very recent,
introduced when the return type of it87_gpio_set() was changed from void
to int.
Probably (again, I don't know if this is actually wrong, I'm not that
familiar with how this chip works) superio_exit() should remain above
`exit:` and `if(rc) goto exit;` after `rc = it87_gpio_set(chip,
gpio_num, val);` should be removed, so:
- if superio_enter() fails, its error code is returned,
but superio_exit() is *not* called
- the it87_gpio_set(chip, gpio_num, val); return code is returned by
it87_gpio_direction_out() no matter if it succeeds or fails,
but in either case superio_exit() is called
Cheers,
Daniel
On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 3:42 PM Daniel Gibson <daniel@gibson.sh> wrote:
>
> On 12/9/25 07:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > We always call superio_enter() in it87_gpio_direction_out() but only
> > call superio_exit() if the call to it87_gpio_set() succeeds. Move the
> > label to balance the calls in error path as well.
> >
> > Fixes: ef877a159072 ("gpio: it87: use new line value setter callbacks")
> > Reported-by: Daniel Gibson <daniel@gibson.sh>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bd0a00e3-9b8c-43e8-8772-e67b91f4c71e@gibson.sh/
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> > index 5d677bcfccf2..528ac1890613 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> > @@ -254,9 +254,8 @@ static int it87_gpio_direction_out(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > if (rc)
> > goto exit;
> >
> > - superio_exit();
> > -
> > exit:
> > + superio_exit();
> > spin_unlock(&it87_gpio->lock);
> > return rc;
> > }
>
> Moving this after exit: means that superio_exit() is also called if
> superio_enter() failed, a few lines above this patch:
>
> rc = superio_enter();
> if (rc)
> goto exit;
>
> I don't know if this is really wrong, but it looks fishy and this code
> behaved differently for years - in contrast to the change to skip
> superio_exit() if it87_gpio_set() failed, which is very recent,
> introduced when the return type of it87_gpio_set() was changed from void
> to int.
>
> Probably (again, I don't know if this is actually wrong, I'm not that
> familiar with how this chip works) superio_exit() should remain above
> `exit:` and `if(rc) goto exit;` after `rc = it87_gpio_set(chip,
> gpio_num, val);` should be removed, so:
> - if superio_enter() fails, its error code is returned,
> but superio_exit() is *not* called
> - the it87_gpio_set(chip, gpio_num, val); return code is returned by
> it87_gpio_direction_out() no matter if it succeeds or fails,
> but in either case superio_exit() is called
>
You're probably right, I don't really know this chip either. I will
send a better version.
Bart
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.