Required vco rate is set by programming decimal and fraction
from 64 bit calculation. This programmed rate is not exactly
matching the requested rate and corresponding recalc_rate is
having rounding error due to this delta.

When setting byte_clk and byte_intf_clk from this pll,
set_rate on byte_intf_clk resulting in dividers getting
reprogrammed, which are already set from byte_clk.
Convert this recalc_rate to KHz and back to Hz to round up
this delta in calculation.

Signed-off-by: Prahlad Valluru <venkata.valluru@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
index 32f06edd21a9..00f20c5a7c73 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
@@ -598,6 +598,12 @@ static unsigned long dsi_pll_7nm_vco_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	pll_freq += div_u64(tmp64, multiplier);
 
 	vco_rate = pll_freq;
+	/*
+	 * Recalculating the rate from dec and frac doesn't end up the rate
+	 * we originally set. Convert the freq to KHz, round it up and
+	 * convert it back to Hz.
+	 */
+	vco_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(vco_rate, 1000) * 1000;
 	pll_7nm->vco_current_rate = vco_rate;
 
 	DBG("DSI PLL%d returning vco rate = %lu, dec = %x, frac = %x",

---
base-commit: 63c971af40365ee706c7e24f6a7900d693518f09
change-id: 20251125-msm-dsi-phy-7nm-clk-rate-26723a3b686c

Best regards,
-- 
Prahlad Valluru <venkata.valluru@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 11/25/25 4:25 PM, Prahlad Valluru wrote:
> Required vco rate is set by programming decimal and fraction
> from 64 bit calculation. This programmed rate is not exactly
> matching the requested rate and corresponding recalc_rate is
> having rounding error due to this delta.

Feel free to wrap your emails at 72 characters

> When setting byte_clk and byte_intf_clk from this pll,
> set_rate on byte_intf_clk resulting in dividers getting
> reprogrammed, which are already set from byte_clk.
> Convert this recalc_rate to KHz and back to Hz to round up
> this delta in calculation.

This feels odd. What if we wanted to set the non-1000-aligned rate?
I think the solution here would be to properly implement .determine_rate,
so that when we request e.g. 1 GHz, the clock framework will be aware
of 1.0001 (example numbers) that will actually be programmed

Konrad

> Signed-off-by: Prahlad Valluru <venkata.valluru@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> index 32f06edd21a9..00f20c5a7c73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,12 @@ static unsigned long dsi_pll_7nm_vco_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	pll_freq += div_u64(tmp64, multiplier);
>  
>  	vco_rate = pll_freq;
> +	/*
> +	 * Recalculating the rate from dec and frac doesn't end up the rate
> +	 * we originally set. Convert the freq to KHz, round it up and
> +	 * convert it back to Hz.
> +	 */
> +	vco_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(vco_rate, 1000) * 1000;
>  	pll_7nm->vco_current_rate = vco_rate;
>  
>  	DBG("DSI PLL%d returning vco rate = %lu, dec = %x, frac = %x",
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 63c971af40365ee706c7e24f6a7900d693518f09
> change-id: 20251125-msm-dsi-phy-7nm-clk-rate-26723a3b686c
> 
> Best regards,

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 08:55:07PM +0530, Prahlad Valluru wrote:
> Required vco rate is set by programming decimal and fraction
> from 64 bit calculation. This programmed rate is not exactly
> matching the requested rate and corresponding recalc_rate is
> having rounding error due to this delta.
> 
> When setting byte_clk and byte_intf_clk from this pll,
> set_rate on byte_intf_clk resulting in dividers getting
> reprogrammed, which are already set from byte_clk.
> Convert this recalc_rate to KHz and back to Hz to round up
> this delta in calculation.

Should the same fix be applied to other generations too?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Prahlad Valluru <venkata.valluru@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> index 32f06edd21a9..00f20c5a7c73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,12 @@ static unsigned long dsi_pll_7nm_vco_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  	pll_freq += div_u64(tmp64, multiplier);
>  
>  	vco_rate = pll_freq;
> +	/*
> +	 * Recalculating the rate from dec and frac doesn't end up the rate
> +	 * we originally set. Convert the freq to KHz, round it up and
> +	 * convert it back to Hz.
> +	 */
> +	vco_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(vco_rate, 1000) * 1000;
>  	pll_7nm->vco_current_rate = vco_rate;
>  
>  	DBG("DSI PLL%d returning vco rate = %lu, dec = %x, frac = %x",
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 63c971af40365ee706c7e24f6a7900d693518f09
> change-id: 20251125-msm-dsi-phy-7nm-clk-rate-26723a3b686c
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Prahlad Valluru <venkata.valluru@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry