[PATCH v3 25/29] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters

James Morse posted 29 patches 3 months, 3 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 25/29] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters
Posted by James Morse 3 months, 3 weeks ago
From: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>

mpam v0.1 and versions above v1.0 support optional long counter for
memory bandwidth monitoring. The MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR register has fields
indicating support for long counters.

Probe these feature bits.

The mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu feature is used to indicate that bandwidth
monitors are supported, instead of muddling this with which size of
bandwidth monitors, add an explicit 31 bit counter feature.

Signed-off-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>
[ morse: Added 31bit counter feature to simplify later logic ]
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
---
Changes since v2:
 * Added 31 bit counter type feature.
 * Altered commit message.
---
 drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c  | 13 +++++++++++--
 drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
index deb1dcc6f6b1..f4d07234ce10 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
@@ -777,16 +777,25 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
 				dev_err_once(dev, "Counters are not usable because not-ready timeout was not provided by firmware.");
 		}
 		if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_MBWU, msmon_features)) {
-			bool hw_managed;
+			bool has_long, hw_managed;
 			u32 mbwumon_idr = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBWUMON_IDR);
 
 			props->num_mbwu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, mbwumon_idr);
-			if (props->num_mbwu_mon)
+			if (props->num_mbwu_mon) {
 				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu, props);
+				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter, props);
+			}
 
 			if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_HAS_RWBW, mbwumon_idr))
 				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw, props);
 
+			has_long = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_HAS_LONG, mbwumon_idr);
+			if (props->num_mbwu_mon && has_long) {
+				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, props);
+				if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_LWD, mbwumon_idr))
+					mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, props);
+			}
+
 			/* Is NRDY hardware managed? */
 			hw_managed = mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(ris, MBWU);
 			if (hw_managed)
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
index 28c475d18d86..ff38b4bbfc2b 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ enum mpam_device_features {
 	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_xcl,
 	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy,
 	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu,
+	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter,
+	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter,
+	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter,
 	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_capture,
 	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw,
 	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy,
-- 
2.39.5
Re: [PATCH v3 25/29] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters
Posted by Jonathan Cameron 3 months, 2 weeks ago
On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 18:56:41 +0000
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote:

> From: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>
> 
> mpam v0.1 and versions above v1.0 support optional long counter for
> memory bandwidth monitoring. The MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR register has fields
> indicating support for long counters.
> 
> Probe these feature bits.
> 
> The mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu feature is used to indicate that bandwidth
> monitors are supported, instead of muddling this with which size of
> bandwidth monitors, add an explicit 31 bit counter feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>
> [ morse: Added 31bit counter feature to simplify later logic ]
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
With or without the change Ben suggested.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Re: [PATCH v3 25/29] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters
Posted by Ben Horgan 3 months, 2 weeks ago
Hi James,

On 10/17/25 19:56, James Morse wrote:
> From: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>
> 
> mpam v0.1 and versions above v1.0 support optional long counter for
> memory bandwidth monitoring. The MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR register has fields
> indicating support for long counters.
> 
> Probe these feature bits.
> 
> The mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu feature is used to indicate that bandwidth
> monitors are supported, instead of muddling this with which size of
> bandwidth monitors, add an explicit 31 bit counter feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>
> [ morse: Added 31bit counter feature to simplify later logic ]
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
>  * Added 31 bit counter type feature.
>  * Altered commit message.
> ---
>  drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c  | 13 +++++++++++--
>  drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index deb1dcc6f6b1..f4d07234ce10 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -777,16 +777,25 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>  				dev_err_once(dev, "Counters are not usable because not-ready timeout was not provided by firmware.");
>  		}
>  		if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_MBWU, msmon_features)) {
> -			bool hw_managed;
> +			bool has_long, hw_managed;
>  			u32 mbwumon_idr = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBWUMON_IDR);
>  
>  			props->num_mbwu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, mbwumon_idr);
> -			if (props->num_mbwu_mon)
> +			if (props->num_mbwu_mon) {
>  				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu, props);
> +				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter, props);
> +			}
>  
>  			if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_HAS_RWBW, mbwumon_idr))
>  				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw, props);
>  
> +			has_long = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_HAS_LONG, mbwumon_idr);
> +			if (props->num_mbwu_mon && has_long) {
> +				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, props);
> +				if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_LWD, mbwumon_idr))
> +					mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, props);
> +			}
> +

I think it's clearer to set each mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_XXcounter for just
the size of counter the hardware supports rather than all XX up to that
size.

>  			/* Is NRDY hardware managed? */
>  			hw_managed = mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(ris, MBWU);
>  			if (hw_managed)
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> index 28c475d18d86..ff38b4bbfc2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> @@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ enum mpam_device_features {
>  	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_xcl,
>  	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy,
>  	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter,
>  	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_capture,
>  	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw,
>  	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy,

-- 
Thanks,

Ben