[PATCH] clk: samsung: clk-pll: simplify samsung_pll_lock_wait()

André Draszik posted 1 patch 4 hours ago
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
[PATCH] clk: samsung: clk-pll: simplify samsung_pll_lock_wait()
Posted by André Draszik 4 hours ago
readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic() has been updated in 2023 in
commit 7349a69cf312 ("iopoll: Do not use timekeeping in
read_poll_timeout_atomic()") to avoid usage of timekeeping APIs. It
also never used udelay() when no delay was given.

With the implementation avoiding timekeeping APIs, and with a caller
not passing a delay, the timeout argument simply becomes a loop
counter.

Therefore the code here can be simplified to unconditionally use
readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(). The difference being the last
argument, the timeout (loop counter). Simply adjust it to pass the
more generous counter in all cases.

Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index 7bea7be1d7e45c32f0b303ffa55ce9cde4a4f71d..a7e693f6983ec073bedd633ed8da7efafc1a20bb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -17,8 +17,7 @@
 #include "clk.h"
 #include "clk-pll.h"
 
-#define PLL_TIMEOUT_US		20000U
-#define PLL_TIMEOUT_LOOPS	1000000U
+#define PLL_TIMEOUT_LOOPS	20000U
 
 struct samsung_clk_pll {
 	struct clk_hw		hw;
@@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ arch_initcall(samsung_pll_disable_early_timeout);
 static int samsung_pll_lock_wait(struct samsung_clk_pll *pll,
 				 unsigned int reg_mask)
 {
-	int i, ret;
+	int ret;
 	u32 val;
 
 	/*
@@ -93,25 +92,15 @@ static int samsung_pll_lock_wait(struct samsung_clk_pll *pll,
 	 * initialized, another when the timekeeping is suspended. udelay() also
 	 * cannot be used when the clocksource is not running on arm64, since
 	 * the current timer is used as cycle counter. So a simple busy loop
-	 * is used here in that special cases. The limit of iterations has been
-	 * derived from experimental measurements of various PLLs on multiple
-	 * Exynos SoC variants. Single register read time was usually in range
-	 * 0.4...1.5 us, never less than 0.4 us.
+	 * is used here.
+	 * The limit of iterations has been derived from experimental
+	 * measurements of various PLLs on multiple Exynos SoC variants. Single
+	 * register read time was usually in range 0.4...1.5 us, never less than
+	 * 0.4 us.
 	 */
-	if (pll_early_timeout || timekeeping_suspended) {
-		i = PLL_TIMEOUT_LOOPS;
-		while (i-- > 0) {
-			if (readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg) & reg_mask)
-				return 0;
-
-			cpu_relax();
-		}
-		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-	} else {
-		ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(pll->con_reg, val,
-					val & reg_mask, 0, PLL_TIMEOUT_US);
-	}
-
+	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(pll->con_reg, val,
+						val & reg_mask, 0,
+						PLL_TIMEOUT_LOOPS);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		pr_err("Could not lock PLL %s\n", clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw));
 

---
base-commit: 3b9b1f8df454caa453c7fb07689064edb2eda90a
change-id: 20251001-samsung-clk-pll-simplification-3e02f8912122

Best regards,
-- 
André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>