LinkEase EasePi R1 [1] is a high-performance mini router.

Specification:
- Rockchip RK3568
- 2GB/4GB LPDDR4 RAM
- 16GB on-board eMMC
- 1x M.2 key for 2280 NVMe (PCIe 3.0)
- 1x USB 3.0 Type-A
- 1x USB 2.0 Type-C (for USB flashing)
- 2x 1000 Base-T (native, RTL8211F)
- 2x 2500 Base-T (PCIe, RTL8125B)
- 1x HDMI 2.0 Output
- 12v DC Jack
- 1x Power key connected to PMIC
- 2x LEDs (one static power supplied, one GPIO controlled)

[1] https://doc.linkease.com/zh/guide/easepi-r1/hardware.html

Signed-off-by: Liangbin Lian <jjm2473@gmail.com>
---

Changes in v2:
- Change deprecated "rockchip,system-power-controller" to "system-power-controller"
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925055906.83375-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/

Changes in v3:
- Fix typo ('status = "disable"' -> 'status = "disabled"') found by kernel test robot https://lore.kernel.org/all/202509261328.Grjhp029-lkp@intel.com/
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925092037.13582-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/

---

Liangbin Lian (3):
  dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document LinkEase
  dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add LinkEase EasePi R1
  arm64: dts: rockchip: add LinkEase EasePi R1

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml     |   5 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts    | 692 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 700 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts


base-commit: d0ca0df179c4b21e2a6c4a4fb637aa8fa14575cb
-- 
2.51.0

On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 8:57 AM CEST, Liangbin Lian wrote:
> LinkEase EasePi R1 [1] is a high-performance mini router.
> ...
> [1] https://doc.linkease.com/zh/guide/easepi-r1/hardware.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Liangbin Lian <jjm2473@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Change deprecated "rockchip,system-power-controller" to "system-power-controller"
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925055906.83375-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/

You received an Acked-by on patch 1 and 2 in v1 of this patch set.
You're supposed to add that to the next/new version(s) or explain why
you choose not to do that (bc f.e. there was a major change, but that
does not seem applicable to those patches).

Cheers,
  Diederik

> Changes in v3:
> - Fix typo ('status = "disable"' -> 'status = "disabled"') found by kernel test robot https://lore.kernel.org/all/202509261328.Grjhp029-lkp@intel.com/
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925092037.13582-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/
>
> ---
>
> Liangbin Lian (3):
>   dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document LinkEase
>   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add LinkEase EasePi R1
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: add LinkEase EasePi R1
>
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml     |   5 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts    | 692 ++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 700 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts
>
>
> base-commit: d0ca0df179c4b21e2a6c4a4fb637aa8fa14575cb

I will fix that in v4.

I just forget to add `Acked-by` after `git format-patch`.
I will re-patch my local tree, add `Acked-by` to commit message,
then `git format-patch`.

I have another question. If there are reviewers or co-authors later,
do I need to add it to the commit message and send it again?
Or should the reviewer or co-author add the message and
continue to deliver the patch?

Thanks!
  Liangbin

Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> 于2025年9月29日周一 18:20写道：
>
> On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 8:57 AM CEST, Liangbin Lian wrote:
> > LinkEase EasePi R1 [1] is a high-performance mini router.
> > ...
> > [1] https://doc.linkease.com/zh/guide/easepi-r1/hardware.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liangbin Lian <jjm2473@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Change deprecated "rockchip,system-power-controller" to "system-power-controller"
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925055906.83375-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/
>
> You received an Acked-by on patch 1 and 2 in v1 of this patch set.
> You're supposed to add that to the next/new version(s) or explain why
> you choose not to do that (bc f.e. there was a major change, but that
> does not seem applicable to those patches).
>
> Cheers,
>   Diederik
>
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Fix typo ('status = "disable"' -> 'status = "disabled"') found by kernel test robot https://lore.kernel.org/all/202509261328.Grjhp029-lkp@intel.com/
> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925092037.13582-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Liangbin Lian (3):
> >   dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document LinkEase
> >   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add LinkEase EasePi R1
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: add LinkEase EasePi R1
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml     |   5 +
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts    | 692 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 700 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts
> >
> >
> > base-commit: d0ca0df179c4b21e2a6c4a4fb637aa8fa14575cb
>

On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 8:09 PM CEST, jjm2473 wrote:
> I have another question. If there are reviewers or co-authors later,
> do I need to add it to the commit message and send it again?
> Or should the reviewer or co-author add the message and
> continue to deliver the patch?

When you get a Reviewed-by tag, you should add that tag too to a new
version. But there's no need to send a new version to just add those
tags, the tooling used by maintainers picks those up themselves.

If you 'just' get review comments, then you'd usually just
improve the patch and you could reference it in a changelog item (to
indicate you addressed it, ttboyk).
If you think a reviewer helped you 'significantly', you could choose to
add an Helped-by tag, but whether you think someone deserves some
credits that way, is up to you(r judgement).

(Co-)authors are usually known upon first submission. If you later find
out that that list was incorrect/incomplete, then you would add
Co-developed-by + Signed-off-by tags on a new version.

HTH,
  Diederik

> Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> 于2025年9月29日周一 18:20写道：
>>
>> On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 8:57 AM CEST, Liangbin Lian wrote:
>> > LinkEase EasePi R1 [1] is a high-performance mini router.
>> > ...
>> > [1] https://doc.linkease.com/zh/guide/easepi-r1/hardware.html
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Liangbin Lian <jjm2473@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Changes in v2:
>> > - Change deprecated "rockchip,system-power-controller" to "system-power-controller"
>> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925055906.83375-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/
>>
>> You received an Acked-by on patch 1 and 2 in v1 of this patch set.
>> You're supposed to add that to the next/new version(s) or explain why
>> you choose not to do that (bc f.e. there was a major change, but that
>> does not seem applicable to those patches).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Diederik
>>
>> > Changes in v3:
>> > - Fix typo ('status = "disable"' -> 'status = "disabled"') found by kernel test robot https://lore.kernel.org/all/202509261328.Grjhp029-lkp@intel.com/
>> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925092037.13582-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/
>> >
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Liangbin Lian (3):
>> >   dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document LinkEase
>> >   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add LinkEase EasePi R1
>> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: add LinkEase EasePi R1
>> >
>> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml     |   5 +
>> >  .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
>> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
>> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts    | 692 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >  4 files changed, 700 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts
>> >
>> >
>> > base-commit: d0ca0df179c4b21e2a6c4a4fb637aa8fa14575cb
>>

Thanks for your explanation! I got it.
  Liangbin

Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> 于2025年9月30日周二 19:19写道：
>
> On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 8:09 PM CEST, jjm2473 wrote:
> > I have another question. If there are reviewers or co-authors later,
> > do I need to add it to the commit message and send it again?
> > Or should the reviewer or co-author add the message and
> > continue to deliver the patch?
>
> When you get a Reviewed-by tag, you should add that tag too to a new
> version. But there's no need to send a new version to just add those
> tags, the tooling used by maintainers picks those up themselves.
>
> If you 'just' get review comments, then you'd usually just
> improve the patch and you could reference it in a changelog item (to
> indicate you addressed it, ttboyk).
> If you think a reviewer helped you 'significantly', you could choose to
> add an Helped-by tag, but whether you think someone deserves some
> credits that way, is up to you(r judgement).
>
> (Co-)authors are usually known upon first submission. If you later find
> out that that list was incorrect/incomplete, then you would add
> Co-developed-by + Signed-off-by tags on a new version.
>
> HTH,
>   Diederik
>
> > Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> 于2025年9月29日周一 18:20写道：
> >>
> >> On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 8:57 AM CEST, Liangbin Lian wrote:
> >> > LinkEase EasePi R1 [1] is a high-performance mini router.
> >> > ...
> >> > [1] https://doc.linkease.com/zh/guide/easepi-r1/hardware.html
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Liangbin Lian <jjm2473@gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > Changes in v2:
> >> > - Change deprecated "rockchip,system-power-controller" to "system-power-controller"
> >> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925055906.83375-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/
> >>
> >> You received an Acked-by on patch 1 and 2 in v1 of this patch set.
> >> You're supposed to add that to the next/new version(s) or explain why
> >> you choose not to do that (bc f.e. there was a major change, but that
> >> does not seem applicable to those patches).
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>   Diederik
> >>
> >> > Changes in v3:
> >> > - Fix typo ('status = "disable"' -> 'status = "disabled"') found by kernel test robot https://lore.kernel.org/all/202509261328.Grjhp029-lkp@intel.com/
> >> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925092037.13582-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > Liangbin Lian (3):
> >> >   dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document LinkEase
> >> >   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add LinkEase EasePi R1
> >> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: add LinkEase EasePi R1
> >> >
> >> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml     |   5 +
> >> >  .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
> >> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
> >> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts    | 692 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  4 files changed, 700 insertions(+)
> >> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > base-commit: d0ca0df179c4b21e2a6c4a4fb637aa8fa14575cb
> >>
>