Hi,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> This series introduces initial support for the SCTLR2_ELx registers in Linux.
> The feature is optional starting from ARMv8.8/ARMv9.3,
> and becomes mandatory from ARMv8.9/ARMv9.4.
>
> Currently, Linux has no strict need to modify SCTLR2_ELx—
> at least assuming that firmware initializes
> these registers to reasonable defaults.
>
> However, several upcoming architectural features will require configuring
> control bits in these registers.
> Notable examples include FEAT_PAuth_LR and FEAT_CPA2.
This looks OK overall to me, apart from some confusion between
SCTLR_ELx and SCTLR2_ELx in patch 2 (see my comments there).
This code will need to be tested somehow. Do you have any thoughts on
this? Hacking the bootwrapper, KVM and/or kvmtool may provide a way of
checking what happens when the kernel is entered with "wrong" initial
values in relevant bits (HRCX_EL2.SCTLR2En, SCTLR2_EL{1,2}).
Regarding the patch history:
> Patch History
> ==============
> from v2 to v3:
> - rewrite commit messages.
> - fix missing SCTLR2_EL2 synchonization at boot.
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811163340.1561893-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com/
>
> from v1 to v2:
> - rebase to v6.17-rc1
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250804121724.3681531-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com/
Going forwards, can you try to make sure that significant changes to
the series are all mentioned here?
I didn't have time to look at v2, and in the meantime half of the
series disappeared and a chunk of code was moved from one patch to
another. I saves reviewers some time and effort if they do not have to
dig through previous review conversations in order to understand what
changed between versions of a series.
(No need to mention every trivial change, though.)
Cheers
---Dave