fs/dax.c | 3 +++ fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 6 +++--- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 11 +++++++++++ fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 5 +++-- fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This series contains an atomic writes fix for DAX support on xfs and an improvement to WARN against using IOCB_ATOMIC on the DAX write path. Also included is an xfs atomic writes mount option fix. Based on xfs -next at ("b0494366bd5b Merge branch 'xfs-6.17-merge' into for-next") John Garry (3): fs/dax: Reject IOCB_ATOMIC in dax_iomap_rw() xfs: disallow atomic writes on DAX xfs: reject max_atomic_write mount option for no reflink fs/dax.c | 3 +++ fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 6 +++--- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 11 +++++++++++ fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 5 +++-- fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.43.5
On 24/07/2025 09:12, John Garry wrote: Hi Carlos, I was expecting you to pick these up. Shall I resend next week after v6.17-rc1 is released? Thanks, John > This series contains an atomic writes fix for DAX support on xfs and > an improvement to WARN against using IOCB_ATOMIC on the DAX write path. > > Also included is an xfs atomic writes mount option fix. > > Based on xfs -next at ("b0494366bd5b Merge branch 'xfs-6.17-merge' into > for-next") > > John Garry (3): > fs/dax: Reject IOCB_ATOMIC in dax_iomap_rw() > xfs: disallow atomic writes on DAX > xfs: reject max_atomic_write mount option for no reflink > > fs/dax.c | 3 +++ > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 6 +++--- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 11 +++++++++++ > fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 5 +++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 10:15:10AM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 24/07/2025 09:12, John Garry wrote: > > Hi Carlos, > > I was expecting you to pick these up. I did, for -rc1. > > Shall I resend next week after v6.17-rc1 is released? No, I already have them queued up for -rc1, no need to send them again Carlos > > Thanks, > John > > > This series contains an atomic writes fix for DAX support on xfs and > > an improvement to WARN against using IOCB_ATOMIC on the DAX write path. > > > > Also included is an xfs atomic writes mount option fix. > > > > Based on xfs -next at ("b0494366bd5b Merge branch 'xfs-6.17-merge' into > > for-next") > > > > John Garry (3): > > fs/dax: Reject IOCB_ATOMIC in dax_iomap_rw() > > xfs: disallow atomic writes on DAX > > xfs: reject max_atomic_write mount option for no reflink > > > > fs/dax.c | 3 +++ > > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 6 +++--- > > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 11 +++++++++++ > > fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 5 +++-- > > fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > >
On 11/08/2025 13:06, Carlos Maiolino wrote: >> I was expecting you to pick these up. > I did, for -rc1. > >> Shall I resend next week after v6.17-rc1 is released? > No, I already have them queued up for -rc1, no need to send them again Great, thanks. I was just prepping to send again :)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 01:08:59PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 11/08/2025 13:06, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > >> I was expecting you to pick these up. > > I did, for -rc1. > > > >> Shall I resend next week after v6.17-rc1 is released? > > No, I already have them queued up for -rc1, no need to send them again > > Great, thanks. I was just prepping to send again :) Sorry, I meant I have them queued up for -rc2 :-) i.e. this week I'm sending them to Linus
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:12:12 +0000, John Garry wrote: > This series contains an atomic writes fix for DAX support on xfs and > an improvement to WARN against using IOCB_ATOMIC on the DAX write path. > > Also included is an xfs atomic writes mount option fix. > > Based on xfs -next at ("b0494366bd5b Merge branch 'xfs-6.17-merge' into > for-next") > > [...] Applied to for-next, thanks! [1/3] fs/dax: Reject IOCB_ATOMIC in dax_iomap_rw() commit: e7fb9b71326f43bab25fb8f18c6bfebd7a628696 [2/3] xfs: disallow atomic writes on DAX commit: 68456d05eb57a5d16b4be2d3caf421bdcf2de72e [3/3] xfs: reject max_atomic_write mount option for no reflink commit: 8dc5e9b037138317c1d3151a7dabe41fa171cee1 Best regards, -- Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.