Both TDX spec and kernel defines SEAMCALL leaf numbers as decimal. Printing
them in hex makes no sense. Correct it.

Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
index f5e2a937c1e7..49267c865f18 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args);
 
 static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args)
 {
-	pr_err("SEAMCALL (0x%016llx) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
+	pr_err("SEAMCALL (%lld) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
 }
 
 static inline void seamcall_err_ret(u64 fn, u64 err,
-- 
2.47.1

On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 02:52 -0700, Gao, Chao wrote:
> Both TDX spec and kernel defines SEAMCALL leaf numbers as decimal. Printing
> them in hex makes no sense. Correct it.
> 
> Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> index f5e2a937c1e7..49267c865f18 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args);
>  
>  static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args)
>  {
> -	pr_err("SEAMCALL (0x%016llx) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
> +	pr_err("SEAMCALL (%lld) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void seamcall_err_ret(u64 fn, u64 err,