From nobody Fri Dec 19 16:26:28 2025 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FAD22370F; Fri, 23 May 2025 09:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747994006; cv=none; b=gGN2wY1Hnd5/giyVT+HKBc/NI5OogO85NtvZ/bBldX9phDOxULeIk99ZuIwd/GiVOUYCG5mH2gdDrmeuIuVxD91c4YjiPAJZUOU1cifFjhC4ewQByuKiUWzHypcKXt657el6uQy5+ID2zH8sxWFCm3jWz2kQHzlZG1eTlkduaR4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747994006; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sOkw1JG9iRLRW+PGBK0WHlQW7LGgtjnpZzL8wyQuJY4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=qJ7xPqSjIcY8ItpTOQ9s7LcKCNQCc+MsjmO6SlumOzN4CyGCDMeimYWtt793llTnYMBN9w7DFsEsaYrf4kVaR4kiVeWRkGIRtZN9xApWM4sCZYoLP+TpTMdjVsQej+wAShhiGXMgbgg/UH3HByhOueMnhc5e/48BdXJ+v28luhc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ffVXNUw2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ffVXNUw2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1747994005; x=1779530005; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sOkw1JG9iRLRW+PGBK0WHlQW7LGgtjnpZzL8wyQuJY4=; b=ffVXNUw2In4z2PwzVspyM0PZdWzpdHrvxuzVm95DzW7H5b4WQ5EyGO4c xOWmzoMHsYAZB6GfazojFbvmbNotbINbdtNotNDxtkPjSCU5XYpX+pNON 5T91rELA/TwHbYga4H4d1B4FtpzRN2psj0PQxCt8QVGA0hUfdlhaDn6Rv LPvOhBK8v6zuCAMRqsjbMGgJk5XwE7p/F1/F8e25vPFUzsZXmscHgbXdb DsRGlpsJlqIGNULVT2Mb2LtbAXvlD8FhkvOovontquXFJl8U+xfY36wVP rF91wmIDxE4MqyFxQV1EYBy8qDrHomAciiUYbKf91I4luH7ALygNzq+VZ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vaEtmKAyStqXmMRnmO02hA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uuQUse4aQh2s7hoimbv8XA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11441"; a="75444091" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,308,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="75444091" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 May 2025 02:53:24 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LWnOCfaCS6O6i9s/kN5tgQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DKR8vC3TTPe3/tFWKLB7PQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,308,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="164315034" Received: from 984fee019967.jf.intel.com ([10.165.54.94]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 May 2025 02:53:23 -0700 From: Chao Gao To: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Chao Gao , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Farrah Chen , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/virt/tdx: Print SEAMCALL leaf numbers in decimal Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 02:52:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20250523095322.88774-2-chao.gao@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.1 In-Reply-To: <20250523095322.88774-1-chao.gao@intel.com> References: <20250523095322.88774-1-chao.gao@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Both TDX spec and kernel defines SEAMCALL leaf numbers as decimal. Printing them in hex makes no sense. Correct it. Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Signed-off-by: Chao Gao Tested-by: Farrah Chen Reviewed-by: Kai Huang --- arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c index f5e2a937c1e7..49267c865f18 100644 --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx= _module_args *args); =20 static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *a= rgs) { - pr_err("SEAMCALL (0x%016llx) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err); + pr_err("SEAMCALL (%lld) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err); } =20 static inline void seamcall_err_ret(u64 fn, u64 err, --=20 2.47.1