drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
The order of rockchip_pci_core_rsts follows the previous comments suggesting
to avoid reordering. However, reset_control_bulk_deassert() applies resets in
reverse, which may lead to the link downgrading to 2.5 GT/s.
This patch restores the deassert order and comments for core_rsts, introduced in
commit 58c6990c5ee7 ("PCI: rockchip: Improve the deassert sequence of four reset pins").
Tested on NanoPC-T4 with Samsung 970 Pro.
Fixes: 18715931a5c0 ("PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function")
Signed-off-by: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
index 11def598534b..4f63a03d535c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
@@ -320,11 +320,15 @@ static const char * const rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[] = {
"aclk",
};
+/*
+ * Please don't reorder the deassert sequence of the following
+ * four reset pins.
+ */
static const char * const rockchip_pci_core_rsts[] = {
- "mgmt-sticky",
- "core",
- "mgmt",
"pipe",
+ "mgmt",
+ "core",
+ "mgmt-sticky",
};
struct rockchip_pcie {
--
2.49.0-1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:58:22PM +0800, Jensen Huang wrote:
> The order of rockchip_pci_core_rsts follows the previous comments suggesting
> to avoid reordering. However, reset_control_bulk_deassert() applies resets in
> reverse, which may lead to the link downgrading to 2.5 GT/s.
>
> This patch restores the deassert order and comments for core_rsts, introduced in
> commit 58c6990c5ee7 ("PCI: rockchip: Improve the deassert sequence of four reset pins").
>
> Tested on NanoPC-T4 with Samsung 970 Pro.
>
> Fixes: 18715931a5c0 ("PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function")
> Signed-off-by: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>
Thanks for the fix! It looks like 18715931a5c0 appeared in v6.14, so
we should probably add a stable tag so it gets backported there?
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 11def598534b..4f63a03d535c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -320,11 +320,15 @@ static const char * const rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[] = {
> "aclk",
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Please don't reorder the deassert sequence of the following
> + * four reset pins.
> + */
> static const char * const rockchip_pci_core_rsts[] = {
> - "mgmt-sticky",
> - "core",
> - "mgmt",
> "pipe",
> + "mgmt",
> + "core",
> + "mgmt-sticky",
> };
>
> struct rockchip_pcie {
> --
> 2.49.0-1
>
Hi Jensen,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 16:29, Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com> wrote:
>
> The order of rockchip_pci_core_rsts follows the previous comments suggesting
> to avoid reordering. However, reset_control_bulk_deassert() applies resets in
> reverse, which may lead to the link downgrading to 2.5 GT/s.
>
> This patch restores the deassert order and comments for core_rsts, introduced in
> commit 58c6990c5ee7 ("PCI: rockchip: Improve the deassert sequence of four reset pins").
>
> Tested on NanoPC-T4 with Samsung 970 Pro.
>
> Fixes: 18715931a5c0 ("PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function")
> Signed-off-by: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 11def598534b..4f63a03d535c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -320,11 +320,15 @@ static const char * const rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[] = {
> "aclk",
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Please don't reorder the deassert sequence of the following
> + * four reset pins.
> + */
> static const char * const rockchip_pci_core_rsts[] = {
> - "mgmt-sticky",
> - "core",
> - "mgmt",
> "pipe",
> + "mgmt",
> + "core",
> + "mgmt-sticky",
> };
Thanks for this Fix. Could you add my if you can?
Reviewed-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Thanks
-Anand
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 18:58:22 +0800, Jensen Huang wrote:
> The order of rockchip_pci_core_rsts follows the previous comments suggesting
> to avoid reordering. However, reset_control_bulk_deassert() applies resets in
> reverse, which may lead to the link downgrading to 2.5 GT/s.
>
> This patch restores the deassert order and comments for core_rsts, introduced in
> commit 58c6990c5ee7 ("PCI: rockchip: Improve the deassert sequence of four reset pins").
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] PCI: rockchip: Fix order of rockchip_pci_core_rsts
commit: 84d79f3304645d6e87b936d2bf8b8310798efec2
Best regards,
--
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
在 2025/03/28 星期五 18:58, Jensen Huang 写道:
> The order of rockchip_pci_core_rsts follows the previous comments suggesting
> to avoid reordering. However, reset_control_bulk_deassert() applies resets in
> reverse, which may lead to the link downgrading to 2.5 GT/s.
>
> This patch restores the deassert order and comments for core_rsts, introduced in
> commit 58c6990c5ee7 ("PCI: rockchip: Improve the deassert sequence of four reset pins").
>
> Tested on NanoPC-T4 with Samsung 970 Pro.
Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>
> Fixes: 18715931a5c0 ("PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function")
> Signed-off-by: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 11def598534b..4f63a03d535c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -320,11 +320,15 @@ static const char * const rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[] = {
> "aclk",
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Please don't reorder the deassert sequence of the following
> + * four reset pins.
> + */
> static const char * const rockchip_pci_core_rsts[] = {
> - "mgmt-sticky",
> - "core",
> - "mgmt",
> "pipe",
> + "mgmt",
> + "core",
> + "mgmt-sticky",
> };
>
> struct rockchip_pcie {
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:58:22PM +0800, Jensen Huang wrote:
> The order of rockchip_pci_core_rsts follows the previous comments suggesting
> to avoid reordering. However, reset_control_bulk_deassert() applies resets in
> reverse, which may lead to the link downgrading to 2.5 GT/s.
>
Oops! I failed to spot it...
> This patch restores the deassert order and comments for core_rsts, introduced in
> commit 58c6990c5ee7 ("PCI: rockchip: Improve the deassert sequence of four reset pins").
>
> Tested on NanoPC-T4 with Samsung 970 Pro.
>
Thanks for the fix.
> Fixes: 18715931a5c0 ("PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function")
> Signed-off-by: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.