irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.
Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
---
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index 5c058db21821..91581974ef84 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_bus_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain for bus %d\n", bus_index);
- bus->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, bus);
+ bus->domain = irq_domain_create_tree(of_fwnode_handle(node), &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, bus);
if (!bus->domain) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n");
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.49.0