From nobody Wed Dec 17 08:53:07 2025 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250F1253B7E for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742376761; cv=none; b=Y6Sswn4SUc4xUwy84b50Pisa071jaFuqtKS7W17Xls4OT4cXKa7he8MFWkV31B0WE+1Di+gvRlKVSlJQYWDZqCPIlt5e03qnZJoE0Sbk5Qq5n+a0M8DH+aHRYu7YDbg1L5JM29JkNi5sDoSTNCTmTUo5OP988E5And1MST9DIHo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742376761; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z4yA1AHEAaUKQTQ9BXveXhf762g+/LA8fFsPbfITlKc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=CN0r2/dZtRRLanvuC93bQdlJoPJrNrQviCgxcmlExGqpV39vVHTxZA7rdeRhm5u01+icFbe1xrtk1xqguPYvNpHq2QQ0QuUOOQxHTwJtvTSwgmwMs5hVRJ2sA3wUpquVYfpuYCgALgZUY1zvPCaHgbTav/B1vUGZ0uyhLZQjsK4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZrGAUEN5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZrGAUEN5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3642C4CEEA; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:32:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742376761; bh=Z4yA1AHEAaUKQTQ9BXveXhf762g+/LA8fFsPbfITlKc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZrGAUEN5HcUy65VXgldOPlWfqb6WG81/8lH0a2Yf9OqO4fnKf88SivWBkT/9ihpuq 8azJwwfTClHTpKfa90hChUNJPZWmsx5aq4V50wfdrTOjJYOPez+kk9bOiPC07AWGaP 1BWNNh+xj9RJfhUF8UfEtY5GfRHYXTNtbItwsaV/6y7w7JvlXHp/GTJQa2AYq4lsmI b3ja0kZ8PpS/mNc2Y+t31CeUjV0I0tdiLGTyMTKv8ROOENnDeqKWM3PZ2GpEqs0KqD iVOHaws8+ENGuvem2NYPVGP5+iHkDlzi9qrFLZz5eD8fXkfKtbL363PvpihgSYsFDv LRBMsm7OE8fxA== From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" To: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" , Stephen Boyd Subject: [PATCH v2 36/57] irqdomain: spmi: Switch to irq_domain_create_tree() Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:29:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20250319092951.37667-37-jirislaby@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 In-Reply-To: <20250319092951.37667-1-jirislaby@kernel.org> References: <20250319092951.37667-1-jirislaby@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the parameter. Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW). Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) Cc: Stephen Boyd --- drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c index 5c058db21821..91581974ef84 100644 --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c @@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_bus_init(struct platform_dev= ice *pdev, =20 dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding irq domain for bus %d\n", bus_index); =20 - bus->domain =3D irq_domain_add_tree(node, &pmic_arb_irq_domain_ops, bus); + bus->domain =3D irq_domain_create_tree(of_fwnode_handle(node), &pmic_arb_= irq_domain_ops, bus); if (!bus->domain) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to create irq_domain\n"); return -ENOMEM; --=20 2.49.0