.../bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml | 16 +- .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 277 ++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
The Rockchip RK3528 has two Ethernet controllers, one 100/10 MAC to be used with the integrated PHY and a second 1000/100/10 MAC to be used with an external Ethernet PHY. This series add initial support for the Ethernet controllers found in RK3528 and initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY. This series depends on v2 of the "net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Validate GRF and peripheral GRF during probe" [1] cleanup series. Changes in v2: - Restrict the minItems: 4 change to rockchip,rk3528-gmac - Add initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY in RK3528 - Split device tree changes into a separate series [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308213720.2517944-1-jonas@kwiboo.se/ David Wu (1): net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Add GMAC support for RK3528 Jonas Karlman (4): dt-bindings: net: rockchip-dwmac: Add compatible string for RK3528 net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Move integrated_phy_powerup/down functions net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Add integrated_phy_powerdown operation net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Add initial support for RK3528 integrated PHY .../bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml | 16 +- .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 277 ++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) -- 2.48.1
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:26:10PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > The Rockchip RK3528 has two Ethernet controllers, one 100/10 MAC to be > used with the integrated PHY and a second 1000/100/10 MAC to be used > with an external Ethernet PHY. > > This series add initial support for the Ethernet controllers found in > RK3528 and initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY. > > This series depends on v2 of the "net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Validate GRF > and peripheral GRF during probe" [1] cleanup series. > > > Changes in v2: > - Restrict the minItems: 4 change to rockchip,rk3528-gmac > - Add initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY in RK3528 > - Split device tree changes into a separate series > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308213720.2517944-1-jonas@kwiboo.se/ Hi Jonas, This patchset looks reasonable to me. However it will need to be reposted once it's dependencies ([1]) are present in net-next. And on the topic of process: * As this is a patch-set for net-next it would be best to target it accordingly: Subject: [PATCH net-next] ... * Please post patches for net/net-next which have dependencies as RFCs. For more information on Netdev processes please take a look at https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html -- pw-bot: deferred
Hi Simon, On 2025-03-17 20:43, Simon Horman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:26:10PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: >> The Rockchip RK3528 has two Ethernet controllers, one 100/10 MAC to be >> used with the integrated PHY and a second 1000/100/10 MAC to be used >> with an external Ethernet PHY. >> >> This series add initial support for the Ethernet controllers found in >> RK3528 and initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY. >> >> This series depends on v2 of the "net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Validate GRF >> and peripheral GRF during probe" [1] cleanup series. >> >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Restrict the minItems: 4 change to rockchip,rk3528-gmac >> - Add initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY in RK3528 >> - Split device tree changes into a separate series >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308213720.2517944-1-jonas@kwiboo.se/ > > Hi Jonas, > > This patchset looks reasonable to me. However it will need > to be reposted once it's dependencies ([1]) are present in net-next. The dependent series ([1]) has already been merged into net-next [2]. Do I still need to repost this series? [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/174186063226.1446759.12026198009173732573.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/ > > And on the topic of process: > > * As this is a patch-set for net-next it would be best to > target it accordingly: > > Subject: [PATCH net-next] ... > > * Please post patches for net/net-next which have dependencies as RFCs. > > For more information on Netdev processes please take a look at > https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html > Thanks, I see, netdev seem to use a slight different process than what I am familiar with compared to other Linux subsystems and U-Boot :-) Regards, Jonas
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 08:50:34PM +0100, Jonas Karlman wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 2025-03-17 20:43, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:26:10PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > >> The Rockchip RK3528 has two Ethernet controllers, one 100/10 MAC to be > >> used with the integrated PHY and a second 1000/100/10 MAC to be used > >> with an external Ethernet PHY. > >> > >> This series add initial support for the Ethernet controllers found in > >> RK3528 and initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY. > >> > >> This series depends on v2 of the "net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Validate GRF > >> and peripheral GRF during probe" [1] cleanup series. > >> > >> > >> Changes in v2: > >> - Restrict the minItems: 4 change to rockchip,rk3528-gmac > >> - Add initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY in RK3528 > >> - Split device tree changes into a separate series > >> > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308213720.2517944-1-jonas@kwiboo.se/ > > > > Hi Jonas, > > > > This patchset looks reasonable to me. However it will need > > to be reposted once it's dependencies ([1]) are present in net-next. > > The dependent series ([1]) has already been merged into net-next [2]. Thanks, and sorry for not noticing that. > Do I still need to repost this series? Yes, I think that would be best so there is a CI run over the series (the CI doesn't understand dependencies). > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/174186063226.1446759.12026198009173732573.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/ > > > > > And on the topic of process: > > > > * As this is a patch-set for net-next it would be best to > > target it accordingly: > > > > Subject: [PATCH net-next] ... > > > > * Please post patches for net/net-next which have dependencies as RFCs. > > > > For more information on Netdev processes please take a look at > > https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html > > > > Thanks, I see, netdev seem to use a slight different process than what > I am familiar with compared to other Linux subsystems and U-Boot :-) > > Regards, > Jonas >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.