The is_sparx5() check was introduced in an earlier series, to make sure
the sparx5_vcap_init() was not executed on lan969x, as it was not
implemented there yet. Now that it is, remove that check.

Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jens Emil Schulz Østergaard <jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
index bac87e885bf1..2f1013f870fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
@@ -770,12 +770,10 @@ static int sparx5_start(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (is_sparx5(sparx5)) {
-		err = sparx5_vcap_init(sparx5);
-		if (err) {
-			sparx5_unregister_notifier_blocks(sparx5);
-			return err;
-		}
+	err = sparx5_vcap_init(sparx5);
+	if (err) {
+		sparx5_unregister_notifier_blocks(sparx5);
+		return err;
 	}
 
 	/* Start Frame DMA with fallback to register based INJ/XTR */

-- 
2.34.1