From nobody Mon Nov 25 01:45:27 2024 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FE7815359A; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.153.233 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730445014; cv=none; b=arT6xPW/wcLZTkcmWU1MChNWdhC2KxJ6HAtlvfhkC/ZKT0S2qQKpHljDepntIzkR2zL/+8lVwq9g1ufSLlFMwpoq5X68pIBtPil2GL69rxT6n2YnoF9OjtRkvBRx6oHQXX2qkyem+sqpNRDzEaQmb9mwyBzAZXUVkmiJgSkySD0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730445014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qo3EIWZzPe6jD1iFKFUqHh6rrb9GVbIt3i3my3FIISw=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:To:CC; b=ZE5mVlgFZ23OH4FeZU/HQttQCUFywhw24TZuZCs7m6DDIOyWhaeC5WC1zizEwTV+4qdFWTzNqAvHXrvJTuxvN+uxB2TZ35Y6sBPYvf09IaRdnu0OLlIa8wNc1vQjYlEERCtJgPe7JtZmvaUuIq7hXlD7V7F0O9JZPuXdVBj+kEA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=microchip.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b=X/LEM9qj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.153.233 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="X/LEM9qj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1730445012; x=1761981012; h=from:date:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding: message-id:references:in-reply-to:to:cc; bh=qo3EIWZzPe6jD1iFKFUqHh6rrb9GVbIt3i3my3FIISw=; b=X/LEM9qjJ8p7awe89lT0CGrNpusMkE2MzKiJ5pEfVUpS9KcpOyfbXGWI IJibjoGEX9ms/8cyikdF9UQna0OuNhjJS9yvgTLISVRyX9etUC2XD1KFM TnVGV+kLjZ15SQuADVwxP5b+bo9nVUkRPxRjEtXzM+BB+yMdUh+yrGfEw sQ3GeBPj1yEDgf74MuLxpaRfomfes6Bb03zsRdMwhpFiWrGYLyJ9H+qJs 8VMkJioliCYQDGr0gAb+kdCFmvdx7dh2HbJRycrGiA/OoDWvYESLgJA+B mWTp7zEL/SKNOz0A/Z7mQbDDsQBnodyDgB7Ueh1Uj3wYj6qCieDnD5wBf g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cK9dq03ZTAa62dxLS6SkZA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VKcxEam4TJ2pSH5+vhY3Sg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,249,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="33754105" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 01 Nov 2024 00:10:11 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 00:10:02 -0700 Received: from DEN-DL-M70577.microchip.com (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.35 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 00:10:00 -0700 From: Daniel Machon Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 08:09:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: sparx5: execute sparx5_vcap_init() on lan969x Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <20241101-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-3-v1-4-3c76f22f4bfa@microchip.com> References: <20241101-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-3-v1-0-3c76f22f4bfa@microchip.com> In-Reply-To: <20241101-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-3-v1-0-3c76f22f4bfa@microchip.com> To: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Lars Povlsen , Steen Hegelund , =?utf-8?q?Jens_Emil_Schulz_=C3=98stergaard?= , , , CC: , , X-Mailer: b4 0.14-dev The is_sparx5() check was introduced in an earlier series, to make sure the sparx5_vcap_init() was not executed on lan969x, as it was not implemented there yet. Now that it is, remove that check. Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund Reviewed-by: Jens Emil Schulz =C3=98stergaard Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon --- drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c b/drivers/= net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c index bac87e885bf1..2f1013f870fb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c @@ -770,12 +770,10 @@ static int sparx5_start(struct sparx5 *sparx5) if (err) return err; =20 - if (is_sparx5(sparx5)) { - err =3D sparx5_vcap_init(sparx5); - if (err) { - sparx5_unregister_notifier_blocks(sparx5); - return err; - } + err =3D sparx5_vcap_init(sparx5); + if (err) { + sparx5_unregister_notifier_blocks(sparx5); + return err; } =20 /* Start Frame DMA with fallback to register based INJ/XTR */ --=20 2.34.1