On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:05:11 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> The commits in question do not proove that ACPI IDs exist.
> Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doing that
> for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs.
>
> The to be removed IDs has been checked against the following resources:
> 1) DuckDuckGo
> 2) Google
> 3) MS catalog: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx
> This gives no useful results in regard to DSDT, moreover, the official
> vendor ID in the registry for Lite-On is LCI.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Applied.
> ---
> drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> index 8c516ede9116..3fff5d58ba3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c
> @@ -1610,8 +1610,6 @@ static int ltr501_resume(struct device *dev)
> static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ltr501_pm_ops, ltr501_suspend, ltr501_resume);
>
> static const struct acpi_device_id ltr_acpi_match[] = {
> - { "LTER0501", ltr501 },
> - { "LTER0559", ltr559 },
> { "LTER0301", ltr301 },
> { },
> };