From nobody Mon Nov 25 22:34:53 2024 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C83C3224B68; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729797140; cv=none; b=IuRRf7qKd+AhJyG/o1VXrfgSx6rOsLtRyMREK+liJ05+eJtxiab7wGGAYk+YJxFNn1zZG5qO4FsJEXdSnQ1mV9E2XFv4JGtuaK2ph/ScJ9zk8pgUZlLwbSxyxyLcqczfKbpR9ELQXFTMgbggG3zlgBZE000+Otr5P07fCZeNbJo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729797140; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Iocz/KVSforp7TWPBNMBSymCJu2I9Wm9f+hSS1P8ifo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=BXs373SilWeEh1h1QoUNOh5mgqG29wut0c4z+P6ve9iXKco+5yGA+qv7t55ICYUKBL3LXfwxqUUj/cZZNYioykMO8oa7Eex80eieZVGd7Dg8+XxgtF6Eq4oPsIc5fR717JRgJ+2tb5uZxxU5VP/+DACHW3e/g++KQdA098eMKnE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TkfndoRx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TkfndoRx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729797139; x=1761333139; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Iocz/KVSforp7TWPBNMBSymCJu2I9Wm9f+hSS1P8ifo=; b=TkfndoRxlxQNFeQ/yOi6+PQv8MpaOeJwm/tQEm1NkRoFru8VqBNte3sV mDmTkxbzot+KqfPqBl2ovUnfOQtVCt2HEq2TOTrZC5UFqfSKF8XuNAt00 YQHDzWtfnPpQHf5ShMWOo6tr9LXwDou9/T0OLqaTC45+RZjh60xrihX7p 495kzRoZE9LNiPNzXQk5fvMqVxEEEjT9iOLem2p0f8ihQLDeFFP1G0Sj6 md1e1HApEkMrATs2Apwk0zm7m6qBCJbVUIjCOFcu62J36cFe5gvvLmBG8 fKgH6YUaDjogubu8NNLE0MlW/JP2PJuy4KZ/MnVk3TOW4lD35nYMvMEtD Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: a2U8nMMoT4erEV1J7dttAA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: q3jutD6CRb+D3OGVhPsX5A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11235"; a="46934540" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,230,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="46934540" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2024 12:12:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vbbQ2Q4FT2yD+eWOXpNK+g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZatQtDjqRRqcsokRUtAiTQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,230,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="80266719" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2024 12:12:08 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 1C738ACF; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:12:02 +0300 (EEST) From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Cameron , Marius Cristea , Trevor Gamblin , Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol , Hans de Goede , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: [PATCH v3 22/24] iio: light: ltr501: Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:05:11 +0300 Message-ID: <20241024191200.229894-23-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac In-Reply-To: <20241024191200.229894-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20241024191200.229894-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The commits in question do not proove that ACPI IDs exist. Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doing that for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs. The to be removed IDs has been checked against the following resources: 1) DuckDuckGo 2) Google 3) MS catalog: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx This gives no useful results in regard to DSDT, moreover, the official vendor ID in the registry for Lite-On is LCI. Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c index 8c516ede9116..3fff5d58ba3c 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c @@ -1610,8 +1610,6 @@ static int ltr501_resume(struct device *dev) static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ltr501_pm_ops, ltr501_suspend, ltr501_resu= me); =20 static const struct acpi_device_id ltr_acpi_match[] =3D { - { "LTER0501", ltr501 }, - { "LTER0559", ltr559 }, { "LTER0301", ltr301 }, { }, }; --=20 2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac