Define clocks as supported by the RPMh on the SAR2130P platform. It
seems that on this platform RPMh models only CXO clock.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
index 4acde937114af3d7fdc15f3d125a72d42d0fde21..8cb15430d0171a8ed6b05e51d1901af63a4564c4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
@@ -389,6 +389,16 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(ipa, "IP0");
 DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(pka, "PKA0");
 DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(qpic_clk, "QP0");
 
+static struct clk_hw *sar2130p_rpmh_clocks[] = {
+	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1.hw,
+	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1_ao.hw,
+};
+
+static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sar2130p = {
+	.clks = sar2130p_rpmh_clocks,
+	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sar2130p_rpmh_clocks),
+};
+
 static struct clk_hw *sdm845_rpmh_clocks[] = {
 	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2.hw,
 	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2_ao.hw,
@@ -880,6 +890,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_qdu1000},
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sa8775p},
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sar2130p-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sar2130p},
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7180},
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc8180x},
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc8280xp},

-- 
2.39.5

On 10/21/2024 4:00 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Define clocks as supported by the RPMh on the SAR2130P platform. It
> seems that on this platform RPMh models only CXO clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 11 +++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index 4acde937114af3d7fdc15f3d125a72d42d0fde21..8cb15430d0171a8ed6b05e51d1901af63a4564c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -389,6 +389,16 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(ipa, "IP0");
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(pka, "PKA0");
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(qpic_clk, "QP0");
>   
> +static struct clk_hw *sar2130p_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1_ao.hw,
> +};
> +

Dimtry, could you please add these clocks as well?

DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM-- > rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "clka1", 1
DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk7, ln_bb_clk7_ao, "clka7", 2
DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk8, ln_bb_clk8_ao, "clka8", 4
DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk9, ln_bb_clk9_ao, "clka9", 2

> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sar2130p = {
> +	.clks = sar2130p_rpmh_clocks,
> +	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sar2130p_rpmh_clocks),
> +};
> +


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:03:57PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/21/2024 4:00 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Define clocks as supported by the RPMh on the SAR2130P platform. It
> > seems that on this platform RPMh models only CXO clock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > index 4acde937114af3d7fdc15f3d125a72d42d0fde21..8cb15430d0171a8ed6b05e51d1901af63a4564c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > @@ -389,6 +389,16 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(ipa, "IP0");
> >   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(pka, "PKA0");
> >   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(qpic_clk, "QP0");
> > +static struct clk_hw *sar2130p_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> > +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1.hw,
> > +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1_ao.hw,
> > +};
> > +
> 
> Dimtry, could you please add these clocks as well?
> 
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM-- > rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "clka1", 1
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk7, ln_bb_clk7_ao, "clka7", 2
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk8, ln_bb_clk8_ao, "clka8", 4
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk9, ln_bb_clk9_ao, "clka9", 2

After checking the CMD-DB, I can see "rfclka1", which I can add, but I
don't see clka7/clka8/clka9. Are you sure they are present on the
platform?

I'll add rfclka1 only for now and skip the rest.

> 
> > +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sar2130p = {
> > +	.clks = sar2130p_rpmh_clocks,
> > +	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sar2130p_rpmh_clocks),
> > +};
> > +
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Taniya Das.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 09:34, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/21/2024 4:00 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Define clocks as supported by the RPMh on the SAR2130P platform. It
> > seems that on this platform RPMh models only CXO clock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > index 4acde937114af3d7fdc15f3d125a72d42d0fde21..8cb15430d0171a8ed6b05e51d1901af63a4564c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > @@ -389,6 +389,16 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(ipa, "IP0");
> >   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(pka, "PKA0");
> >   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(qpic_clk, "QP0");
> >
> > +static struct clk_hw *sar2130p_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> > +     [RPMH_CXO_CLK]          = &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1.hw,
> > +     [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]        = &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div1_ao.hw,
> > +};
> > +
>
> Dimtry, could you please add these clocks as well?
>
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM-- > rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "clka1", 1
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk7, ln_bb_clk7_ao, "clka7", 2
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk8, ln_bb_clk8_ao, "clka8", 4
> DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM --> ln_bb_clk9, ln_bb_clk9_ao, "clka9", 2

Just to check, I don't see these clocks being defined in msm-5.10 for
the corresponding platform. Am I missing something?

>
> > +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sar2130p = {
> > +     .clks = sar2130p_rpmh_clocks,
> > +     .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sar2130p_rpmh_clocks),
> > +};
> > +


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry