Replace 'lantency' with 'latency' in the comment.

Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
index 85764e62cbe4..92faf701b8f0 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static s64 cros_ec_sensor_ring_median(s64 *array, size_t length)
  * While a and b are recorded at accurate times (due to the EC real time
  * nature); c is pretty untrustworthy, even though it's recorded the
  * first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good change we'll get
- * added lantency due to:
+ * added latency due to:
  *   other irqs
  *   ddrfreq
  *   cpuidle
-- 
2.25.1