From nobody Wed Dec 31 01:12:59 2025 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64452C4167B for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 18:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345033AbjKISzL (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2023 13:55:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47770 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345074AbjKISzJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2023 13:55:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CBDB3C12 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 10:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1cc28719cb0so2562695ad.0 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:55:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699556107; x=1700160907; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=PRi+qAy0bRoafy49vwIjB8vcVV09afunArSCgU/jH/8=; b=LA+sVoGnwa9W3vsSL4f+Kwf+yFOv9WG90xZDpAOD1jJquoMgHTTTpbzDBgJGP3BEMg oEybdvKTzQHeRTcrfwRvZcwnZjLkEJ53xfoAohGtC9wauweiEwVJAHTnQ8V75F9K4ngS dUbOOrET5eeOFhBlulk+bJRPAzsoICFASsfJ1PW3jltcD0d1hN8AXm7rvfLiRH97i+rf LQtHAZ2PA+WGISy8Xw4VWhC4BsRViw2ymqf9aljYI0/qriyJhwJksSQrNTvbnnHnhkZE H2904BWtrWdfos0ap1JpKjKU8v6nPxXqp6KtjxdUiY3QvOU63cFyfnSTjDxn4EF8ZT1n rdfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699556107; x=1700160907; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PRi+qAy0bRoafy49vwIjB8vcVV09afunArSCgU/jH/8=; b=IQbIidPhytEE91oExz4/rBWTkXzKbDOzkWinqiVoD7XMNrG3n2MPk12CDpAXoKAiqk NBi83jn8Y3MqaOl2Uhxi7niZCRTJ8spsuRzZhNV+f4X3NkGiFH+RBYNXml4AHU9KxrDp Jnq55n1bqNJbqACeR1rJgnAeLERZaNh98YwkMfgpPeSQvoNLn4GsQjn80UdQt9Er09qq xSc8nBCjkK5IybNXPbxI4Nheh26WCIkExVPvdKNODJMZX7oQNGCiNpG/33jvORp4/8DI GnZRKNSfV0VZRh4vft4kd18R/eHcblbE7xH9lXLDaOnYYtBEEx0DAupQ5iIkrz0T4R1y cvPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzdfcVhSxS1FJFx6G992yp+qi+zfcYeHLR/1qKMJHquHI1yHNLc 8JdxMB4WOp39K45cayEy1W0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEjlXJkC2bw7tWXPOMaDfWHKiPmPN5r1CPOZIEmM6XpA/df2WMR8wr6JLELmvE8T9Bj+So2cQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c943:b0:1c7:5581:f9c with SMTP id i3-20020a170902c94300b001c755810f9cmr6369730pla.0.1699556106845; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:55:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([140.116.154.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w19-20020a170902d71300b001c61921d4d2sm3821837ply.302.2023.11.09.10.55.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:55:06 -0800 (PST) From: Kuan-Wei Chiu To: bleung@chromium.org, tzungbi@kernel.org Cc: groeck@chromium.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kuan-Wei Chiu Subject: [PATCH 4/7] platform/chrome: Fix typo 'lantency' in comment Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 02:54:36 +0800 Message-Id: <20231109185439.1535962-5-visitorckw@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20231109185439.1535962-1-visitorckw@gmail.com> References: <20231109185439.1535962-1-visitorckw@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Replace 'lantency' with 'latency' in the comment. Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu --- drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c b/drivers/pla= tform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c index 85764e62cbe4..92faf701b8f0 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static s64 cros_ec_sensor_ring_median(s64 *array, size_= t length) * While a and b are recorded at accurate times (due to the EC real time * nature); c is pretty untrustworthy, even though it's recorded the * first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good change we'll get - * added lantency due to: + * added latency due to: * other irqs * ddrfreq * cpuidle --=20 2.25.1