Hi,

Changes in v2
=============
1. Reversed xmas tree
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230901090224.27770-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Description
===========
Prepare LPASS (Low Power Audio SubSystem) pin controller for newer
Qualcomm SoCs.  The patchset does not bring the newer SoCs yet, but only
re-organizes the code for future changes.

I understand that patch #2 (adding flag) makes little sense without
actual user of that flag, but such user I cannot post yet.

Dependency
==========
Context depends on my previous fix:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230815110625.317971-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof Kozlowski (2):
  pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: split slew rate set to separate function
  pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: allow slew rate bit in main pin config
    register

 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 69 +++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h |  7 +++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:


> Changes in v2

I tried to apply this to the pinctrl devel branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel

It doesn't apply, could you rebase it?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

On 23/10/2023 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Changes in v2
> 
> I tried to apply this to the pinctrl devel branch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel
> 
> It doesn't apply, could you rebase it?

The context depends on my previous fix which you applied and sent for
v6.6 already:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CACRpkdaybnYEmkgv7VG4fh5sXQ7uwHm2wH2Khja-P1b6idYr8w@mail.gmail.com/

I can rebase, but I am afraid it will cause conflicts. Is it reasonable
for you to merge v6.6-rc7 into your devel branch?



Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:22 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 23/10/2023 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Changes in v2
> >
> > I tried to apply this to the pinctrl devel branch:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel
> >
> > It doesn't apply, could you rebase it?
>
> The context depends on my previous fix which you applied and sent for
> v6.6 already:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CACRpkdaybnYEmkgv7VG4fh5sXQ7uwHm2wH2Khja-P1b6idYr8w@mail.gmail.com/
>
> I can rebase, but I am afraid it will cause conflicts. Is it reasonable
> for you to merge v6.6-rc7 into your devel branch?

Torvalds is usually not super-happy when we do that, especially
this late in the development cycle it gets a bit ugly with all
the stuff that brings in.

Can we wait with this patch set until the next development
cycle or is it urgent?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

On 23/10/2023 10:27, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:22 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 23/10/2023 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Changes in v2
>>>
>>> I tried to apply this to the pinctrl devel branch:
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel
>>>
>>> It doesn't apply, could you rebase it?
>>
>> The context depends on my previous fix which you applied and sent for
>> v6.6 already:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CACRpkdaybnYEmkgv7VG4fh5sXQ7uwHm2wH2Khja-P1b6idYr8w@mail.gmail.com/
>>
>> I can rebase, but I am afraid it will cause conflicts. Is it reasonable
>> for you to merge v6.6-rc7 into your devel branch?
> 
> Torvalds is usually not super-happy when we do that, especially
> this late in the development cycle it gets a bit ugly with all
> the stuff that brings in.
> 
> Can we wait with this patch set until the next development
> cycle or is it urgent?

We can wait, no problem with that.

Best regards,
Krzysztof