This patch series enables support for the PWM controlled heat sink fan 
on the Rock 5B SBC and, additionally, converts the hwmon PWM fan bindings 
to DT schema format.

Changes in v2:
 - Updated PATCH 1/2 according to Rob's review
 - Added Reviewed-by from Christopher to PATCH 2/2
 - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403105052.426135-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/

Cristian Ciocaltea (2):
  dt-bindings: hwmon: pwm-fan: Convert to DT schema
  arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588-rock-5b: Add pwm-fan

 .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.txt     |  68 +---------
 .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.yaml    | 119 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts      |  12 ++
 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/pwm-fan.yaml

-- 
2.40.0

On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 20:38:05 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> This patch series enables support for the PWM controlled heat sink fan
> on the Rock 5B SBC and, additionally, converts the hwmon PWM fan bindings
> to DT schema format.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  - Updated PATCH 1/2 according to Rob's review
>  - Added Reviewed-by from Christopher to PATCH 2/2
>  - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403105052.426135-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588-rock-5b: Add pwm-fan
      commit: f36bb17653e4b9e26bbdb1224027d20614e77636

Best regards,
-- 
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

On 4/5/23 10:45, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 20:38:05 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> This patch series enables support for the PWM controlled heat sink fan
>> on the Rock 5B SBC and, additionally, converts the hwmon PWM fan bindings
>> to DT schema format.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - Updated PATCH 1/2 according to Rob's review
>>   - Added Reviewed-by from Christopher to PATCH 2/2
>>   - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403105052.426135-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 

Both patches or only the second one ?

Thanks,
Guenter

Am Mittwoch, 5. April 2023, 21:04:04 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On 4/5/23 10:45, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 20:38:05 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> >> This patch series enables support for the PWM controlled heat sink fan
> >> on the Rock 5B SBC and, additionally, converts the hwmon PWM fan bindings
> >> to DT schema format.
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >>   - Updated PATCH 1/2 according to Rob's review
> >>   - Added Reviewed-by from Christopher to PATCH 2/2
> >>   - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403105052.426135-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/
> >>
> >> [...]
> > 
> > Applied, thanks!
> > 
> 
> Both patches or only the second one ?

only the second one of course. According to earlier talks the dts patch
does already follow the text binding, so the yaml conversion is actually
not a requirement for it.

So I picked the dts patch let the binding sort itself when people have
time for it :-) .


Looking at the mail b4 created, I guessed this would also be visible
with the subject saying (subset) and the listed commits only showing

[2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588-rock-5b: Add pwm-fan
      commit: f36bb17653e4b9e26bbdb1224027d20614e77636


Heiko

On 4/5/23 14:35, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. April 2023, 21:04:04 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>> On 4/5/23 10:45, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 20:38:05 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> This patch series enables support for the PWM controlled heat sink fan
>>>> on the Rock 5B SBC and, additionally, converts the hwmon PWM fan bindings
>>>> to DT schema format.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>    - Updated PATCH 1/2 according to Rob's review
>>>>    - Added Reviewed-by from Christopher to PATCH 2/2
>>>>    - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403105052.426135-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Both patches or only the second one ?
> 
> only the second one of course. According to earlier talks the dts patch
> does already follow the text binding, so the yaml conversion is actually
> not a requirement for it.
> 
> So I picked the dts patch let the binding sort itself when people have
> time for it :-) .
> 
> 
> Looking at the mail b4 created, I guessed this would also be visible
> with the subject saying (subset) and the listed commits only showing
> 
> [2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588-rock-5b: Add pwm-fan
>        commit: f36bb17653e4b9e26bbdb1224027d20614e77636
> 

Kind of, sure, but I figured it doesn't hurt asking to avoid the situation
(again) where I apply a patch and then get a nice e-mail telling me that
some other branch also applied the same patch.

Guenter

Am Donnerstag, 6. April 2023, 20:27:33 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On 4/5/23 14:35, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 5. April 2023, 21:04:04 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> >> On 4/5/23 10:45, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 20:38:05 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> >>>> This patch series enables support for the PWM controlled heat sink fan
> >>>> on the Rock 5B SBC and, additionally, converts the hwmon PWM fan bindings
> >>>> to DT schema format.
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>>    - Updated PATCH 1/2 according to Rob's review
> >>>>    - Added Reviewed-by from Christopher to PATCH 2/2
> >>>>    - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230403105052.426135-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/
> >>>>
> >>>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>
> >> Both patches or only the second one ?
> > 
> > only the second one of course. According to earlier talks the dts patch
> > does already follow the text binding, so the yaml conversion is actually
> > not a requirement for it.
> > 
> > So I picked the dts patch let the binding sort itself when people have
> > time for it :-) .
> > 
> > 
> > Looking at the mail b4 created, I guessed this would also be visible
> > with the subject saying (subset) and the listed commits only showing
> > 
> > [2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588-rock-5b: Add pwm-fan
> >        commit: f36bb17653e4b9e26bbdb1224027d20614e77636
> > 
> 
> Kind of, sure, but I figured it doesn't hurt asking to avoid the situation
> (again) where I apply a patch and then get a nice e-mail telling me that
> some other branch also applied the same patch.

no worries and yes better save than sorry.
Though you had me worried for a bit that somehow the mail b4 generated
for me was faulty ;-)

Heiko