The children of the switch node don't have a unit address, and therefore
should not need the #address-cells or #size-cells entries. Fix the example
schemas accordingly.

Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---

v4 -> v7
  * No change

v3 -> v4
  * Add Reviewed tags

v3
  * New patch

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
index 978162df51f7..6fc9bc985726 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ examples:
 
         switch@10 {
             compatible = "qca,qca8337";
-            #address-cells = <1>;
-            #size-cells = <0>;
             reset-gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
             reg = <0x10>;
 
@@ -209,8 +207,6 @@ examples:
 
         switch@10 {
             compatible = "qca,qca8337";
-            #address-cells = <1>;
-            #size-cells = <0>;
             reset-gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
             reg = <0x10>;
 
-- 
2.25.1