[v3] dt-binding preparation for ocelot switches

[PATCH v3 net-next 02/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: remove address-cells and size-cells from switch node

Posted by Colin Foster 1 year, 11 months ago

The children of the switch node don't have a unit address, and therefore
should not need the #address-cells or #size-cells entries. Fix the example
schemas accordingly.

Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
---

v3
  * New patch

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
index 978162df51f7..6fc9bc985726 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ examples:
 
         switch@10 {
             compatible = "qca,qca8337";
-            #address-cells = <1>;
-            #size-cells = <0>;
             reset-gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
             reg = <0x10>;
 
@@ -209,8 +207,6 @@ examples:
 
         switch@10 {
             compatible = "qca,qca8337";
-            #address-cells = <1>;
-            #size-cells = <0>;
             reset-gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
             reg = <0x10>;
 
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 02/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: remove address-cells and size-cells from switch node

Posted by Rob Herring 1 year, 11 months ago

On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 14:47:26 -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> The children of the switch node don't have a unit address, and therefore
> should not need the #address-cells or #size-cells entries. Fix the example
> schemas accordingly.
> 
> Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
> ---
> 
> v3
>   * New patch
> 
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 02/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: remove address-cells and size-cells from switch node

Posted by Florian Fainelli 1 year, 11 months ago

On 11/27/22 14:47, Colin Foster wrote:
> The children of the switch node don't have a unit address, and therefore
> should not need the #address-cells or #size-cells entries. Fix the example
> schemas accordingly.
> 
> Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian