New version of the pwm timers patch, hopefully all review comments
are sorted out, however I have not had time to fully test this and
I do not have a PCI system to test it on either.

The series has been moved around a bit to try to get some of the
simpler changes in before splitting and to make the OF driver a
single addition.

v4:
 - split pci and of into new modules
 - fixup review comments
 - fix typos in dt-bindings
v3:
- change the compatible name
- squash down pwm count patch
- fixup patch naming

v2:
- fix #pwm-cells count to be 3
- fix indetation 
- merge the two clock patches
- add HAS_IOMEM as a config dependency


Ben Dooks (10):
  dt-bindings: pwm: Document Synopsys DesignWare
    snps,pwm-dw-apb-timers-pwm2
  pwm: dwc: allow driver to be built with COMPILE_TEST
  pwm: dwc: change &pci->dev to dev in probe
  pwm: dwc: move memory alloc to own function
  pwm: dwc: use devm_pwmchip_add
  pwm: dwc: split pci out of core driver
  pwm: dwc: make timer clock configurable
  pwm: dwc: add of/platform support
  pwm: dwc: add snps,pwm-number to limit pwm count
  pwm: dwc: add PWM bit unset in get_state call

 .../bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml |  69 ++++++
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig                           |  24 ++-
 drivers/pwm/Makefile                          |   2 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-of.c                      |  86 ++++++++
 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-pci.c                     | 134 ++++++++++++
 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c                         | 197 +++---------------
 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h                         |  60 ++++++
 7 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-of.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-pci.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h

-- 
2.35.1

Hello Ben,

there was some feedback to individual patches that require a rework. I'm
marking the whole series as "changes requested" in the expectation that
you will resend them all once you addressed the feedback.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

On 27/09/2022 17:47, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Ben,
> 
> there was some feedback to individual patches that require a rework. I'm
> marking the whole series as "changes requested" in the expectation that
> you will resend them all once you addressed the feedback.

I have most of the feedback done but we've not had a chance to test them
fully. I can send a new series later today but the changes for the clock
division calculations have yet to be tested.

-- 
Ben