This provides more context to users.

Old message:

[   00.000000] No UUID available providing old NGUID

New message:

[   00.000000] block nvme0n1: No UUID available providing old NGUID

Fixes: d934f9848a77 ("nvme: provide UUID value to userspace")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 24165daee3c8..189bbd6c0c29 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -3285,8 +3285,7 @@ static ssize_t uuid_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 	 * we have no UUID set
 	 */
 	if (uuid_is_null(&ids->uuid)) {
-		printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
-				   "No UUID available providing old NGUID\n");
+		dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "No UUID available providing old NGUID\n");
 		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%pU\n", ids->nguid);
 	}
 	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%pU\n", &ids->uuid);

base-commit: e71e60cd74df9386c3f684c54888f2367050b831
-- 
2.36.1

Thanks,

applied to nvme-5.19 with the small whitespace fixup.

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 05:55:55PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>  	if (uuid_is_null(&ids->uuid)) {
> -		printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
> -				   "No UUID available providing old NGUID\n");
> +		dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "No UUID available providing old NGUID\n");
>  		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%pU\n", ids->nguid);

The line split was correct to prevent this overly long line. But otherwise,
this looks good, though I'm wondering why this needs to be printed every time
someone reads the attribute.

On 2022-06-07 10:11-0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 05:55:55PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> >  	if (uuid_is_null(&ids->uuid)) {
> > -		printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
> > -				   "No UUID available providing old NGUID\n");
> > +		dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "No UUID available providing old NGUID\n");
> >  		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%pU\n", ids->nguid);
> 
> The line split was correct to prevent this overly long line. But otherwise,
> this looks good, though I'm wondering why this needs to be printed every time
> someone reads the attribute.

Sorry about the long line, thought it looks nicer on one line and other
(similar) lines in the file are also using up to 100 characters per line.
Do you want me to resend it?

No idea why has to be printed every time. A dev_warn_once() would be less
spammy.