Hello,

This series adds devicetree nodes for SDX65. It adds reserved memory 
nodes, SDHCI, smmu and tcsr mutex support.

Changes from v1:
 - Addressed Mani's Comments and made necessary.
 - Rebased on top of v5.18-rc2.

Thanks,
Rohit.

Rohit Agarwal (7):
  ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add reserved memory nodes
  dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Document the SDX65 compatible
  ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add support for SDHCI controller
  dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for SDX65 SMMU
  ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Enable ARM SMMU
  ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add support for TCSR Mutex
  ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add Shared memory manager support

 .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml        |   1 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt          |   1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65-mtp.dts               |  21 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi                  | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 133 insertions(+)

-- 
2.7.4

On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:20:08 +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> This series adds devicetree nodes for SDX65. It adds reserved memory
> nodes, SDHCI, smmu and tcsr mutex support.
> 
> Changes from v1:
>  - Addressed Mani's Comments and made necessary.
>  - Rebased on top of v5.18-rc2.
> 
> [...]

Applied SMMU binding patch to will (for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates), thanks!

[4/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for SDX65 SMMU
      https://git.kernel.org/will/c/5a4eb9163471

However, I must confess that I don't understand the point in updating
the binding documentation but not the driver. Should we be matching on
the new compatible string somewhere?

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev