When building with GCC9 using CFLAG -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 we get:
hw/display/tcx.c: In function ‘tcx_dac_writel’:
hw/display/tcx.c:453:26: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
453 | s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/display/tcx.c:454:9: note: here
454 | default:
| ^~~~~~~
hw/display/tcx.c: In function ‘tcx_dac_readl’:
hw/display/tcx.c:412:22: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
412 | s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/display/tcx.c:413:5: note: here
413 | default:
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Give a hint to GCC by adding the missing fall through comments.
Fixes: 55d7bfe22
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
v2: Reword the description (Aleksandar)
Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com>
Cc: Olivier Danet <odanet@caramail.com>
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
---
hw/display/tcx.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/display/tcx.c b/hw/display/tcx.c
index 14e829d3fa..abbeb30284 100644
--- a/hw/display/tcx.c
+++ b/hw/display/tcx.c
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ static uint64_t tcx_dac_readl(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
case 2:
val = s->b[s->dac_index] << 24;
s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */
+ /* fall through */
default:
s->dac_state = 0;
break;
@@ -451,6 +452,7 @@ static void tcx_dac_writel(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val,
s->b[index] = val >> 24;
update_palette_entries(s, index, index + 1);
s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */
+ /* fall through */
default:
s->dac_state = 0;
break;
--
2.21.0
On 18/12/2019 19:25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > When building with GCC9 using CFLAG -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 we get: > > hw/display/tcx.c: In function ‘tcx_dac_writel’: > hw/display/tcx.c:453:26: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] > 453 | s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > hw/display/tcx.c:454:9: note: here > 454 | default: > | ^~~~~~~ > hw/display/tcx.c: In function ‘tcx_dac_readl’: > hw/display/tcx.c:412:22: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] > 412 | s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > hw/display/tcx.c:413:5: note: here > 413 | default: > | ^~~~~~~ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > Give a hint to GCC by adding the missing fall through comments. > > Fixes: 55d7bfe22 > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > --- > v2: Reword the description (Aleksandar) > > Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com> > Cc: Olivier Danet <odanet@caramail.com> > Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> > --- > hw/display/tcx.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/display/tcx.c b/hw/display/tcx.c > index 14e829d3fa..abbeb30284 100644 > --- a/hw/display/tcx.c > +++ b/hw/display/tcx.c > @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ static uint64_t tcx_dac_readl(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > case 2: > val = s->b[s->dac_index] << 24; > s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > + /* fall through */ > default: > s->dac_state = 0; > break; > @@ -451,6 +452,7 @@ static void tcx_dac_writel(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, > s->b[index] = val >> 24; > update_palette_entries(s, index, index + 1); > s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > + /* fall through */ > default: > s->dac_state = 0; > break; Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> ATB, Mark.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:26 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote: > > When building with GCC9 using CFLAG -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 we get: > > hw/display/tcx.c: In function ‘tcx_dac_writel’: > hw/display/tcx.c:453:26: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] > 453 | s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > hw/display/tcx.c:454:9: note: here > 454 | default: > | ^~~~~~~ > hw/display/tcx.c: In function ‘tcx_dac_readl’: > hw/display/tcx.c:412:22: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] > 412 | s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > hw/display/tcx.c:413:5: note: here > 413 | default: > | ^~~~~~~ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > Give a hint to GCC by adding the missing fall through comments. > > Fixes: 55d7bfe22 > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > --- > v2: Reword the description (Aleksandar) > Reviewed-by: Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com> > Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com> > Cc: Olivier Danet <odanet@caramail.com> > Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> > --- > hw/display/tcx.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/display/tcx.c b/hw/display/tcx.c > index 14e829d3fa..abbeb30284 100644 > --- a/hw/display/tcx.c > +++ b/hw/display/tcx.c > @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ static uint64_t tcx_dac_readl(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > case 2: > val = s->b[s->dac_index] << 24; > s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > + /* fall through */ > default: > s->dac_state = 0; > break; > @@ -451,6 +452,7 @@ static void tcx_dac_writel(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, > s->b[index] = val >> 24; > update_palette_entries(s, index, index + 1); > s->dac_index = (s->dac_index + 1) & 0xff; /* Index autoincrement */ > + /* fall through */ > default: > s->dac_state = 0; > break; > -- > 2.21.0 >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.