tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
Since commit 97d06802d10a ("sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of
bin_attribute::read/write()"), make bin_attribute parameter of
bin_attribute::read/write() const.
Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index e6c248e3ae54..e9e918cdf31f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok;
noinline ssize_t
bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
- struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
+ const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
{
struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx ctx = {
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_read, ERRNO);
noinline ssize_t
bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
- struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
+ const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
{
struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx ctx = {
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static void testmod_unregister_uprobe(void)
static ssize_t
bpf_testmod_uprobe_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
- struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
+ const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
{
unsigned long offset = 0;
--
2.49.0
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 01:53:22PM +0800, Rong Tao wrote:
> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
>
> Since commit 97d06802d10a ("sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of
> bin_attribute::read/write()"), make bin_attribute parameter of
> bin_attribute::read/write() const.
hi,
there's already fix for this in bpf/master
thanks,
jirka
>
> Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> index e6c248e3ae54..e9e918cdf31f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok;
>
> noinline ssize_t
> bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> - struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> + const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
> {
> struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx ctx = {
> @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_read, ERRNO);
>
> noinline ssize_t
> bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> - struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> + const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
> {
> struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx ctx = {
> @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static void testmod_unregister_uprobe(void)
>
> static ssize_t
> bpf_testmod_uprobe_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> - struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> + const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
> {
> unsigned long offset = 0;
> --
> 2.49.0
>
On 6/4/25 16:53, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 01:53:22PM +0800, Rong Tao wrote:
>> From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
>>
>> Since commit 97d06802d10a ("sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of
>> bin_attribute::read/write()"), make bin_attribute parameter of
>> bin_attribute::read/write() const.
> hi,
> there's already fix for this in bpf/master
>
> thanks,
> jirka
I am confused, when should I use bpf/master[2] and when should I use
bpf-next/master[1]? thank you :)
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.