drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
Add support for gd25lq255, gd25lb256, gd25lb512m, gd25b512m, gd55b01ge
and gd55lb01ge. All these chips are tested on Rockchip boards[1].
[1]https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-5.10/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c
Signed-off-by: Renjun Wang <renjunw0@foxmail.com>
---
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c
index ef1edd0add70..f0069a4adbbf 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static const struct flash_info gigadevice_nor_parts[] = {
}, {
.id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x40, 0x19),
.name = "gd25q256",
+ .size = SZ_32M,
.flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB | SPI_NOR_TB_SR_BIT6,
.fixups = &gd25q256_fixups,
.fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES,
@@ -82,6 +83,48 @@ static const struct flash_info gigadevice_nor_parts[] = {
.size = SZ_16M,
.flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB,
.no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ,
+ }, {
+ .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x60, 0x19),
+ .name = "gd25lq255",
+ .size = SZ_32M,
+ .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK,
+ .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ,
+ .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES,
+ }, {
+ .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x19),
+ .name = "gd25lb256",
+ .size = SZ_32M,
+ .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK,
+ .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ,
+ .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES,
+ }, {
+ .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x1a),
+ .name = "gd25lb512m",
+ .size = SZ_64M,
+ .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK,
+ .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ,
+ .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES,
+ }, {
+ .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x47, 0x1a),
+ .name = "gd25b512m",
+ .size = SZ_64M,
+ .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK,
+ .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ,
+ .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES,
+ }, {
+ .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x47, 0x1b),
+ .name = "gd55b01ge",
+ .size = SZ_128M,
+ .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK,
+ .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ,
+ .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES,
+ }, {
+ .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x1b),
+ .name = "gd55lb01ge",
+ .size = SZ_128M,
+ .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK,
+ .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ,
+ .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES,
},
};
--
2.39.2
Le 07/09/2024 à 08:32, Renjun Wang a écrit : > Add support for gd25lq255, gd25lb256, gd25lb512m, gd25b512m, gd55b01ge > and gd55lb01ge. All these chips are tested on Rockchip boards[1]. > > [1]https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-5.10/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c > > Signed-off-by: Renjun Wang <renjunw0@foxmail.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c > index ef1edd0add70..f0069a4adbbf 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static const struct flash_info gigadevice_nor_parts[] = { > }, { > .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x40, 0x19), > .name = "gd25q256", > + .size = SZ_32M, Hi, just for my understanding, why this change? If it is a fix, should it be done a separate patch? Or should it be mentioned in the commit description? CJ > .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB | SPI_NOR_TB_SR_BIT6, > .fixups = &gd25q256_fixups, > .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, > @@ -82,6 +83,48 @@ static const struct flash_info gigadevice_nor_parts[] = { > .size = SZ_16M, > .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB, > .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, > + }, { > + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x60, 0x19), > + .name = "gd25lq255", > + .size = SZ_32M, > + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, > + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, > + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, > + }, { > + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x19), > + .name = "gd25lb256", > + .size = SZ_32M, > + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, > + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, > + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, > + }, { > + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x1a), > + .name = "gd25lb512m", > + .size = SZ_64M, > + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, > + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, > + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, > + }, { > + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x47, 0x1a), > + .name = "gd25b512m", > + .size = SZ_64M, > + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, > + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, > + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, > + }, { > + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x47, 0x1b), > + .name = "gd55b01ge", > + .size = SZ_128M, > + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, > + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, > + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, > + }, { > + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x1b), > + .name = "gd55lb01ge", > + .size = SZ_128M, > + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, > + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, > + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, > }, > }; >
On 9/7/24 15:04, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 07/09/2024 à 08:32, Renjun Wang a écrit : >> Add support for gd25lq255, gd25lb256, gd25lb512m, gd25b512m, gd55b01ge >> and gd55lb01ge. All these chips are tested on Rockchip boards[1]. >> >> [1]https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-5.10/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Renjun Wang <renjunw0@foxmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c >> b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c >> index ef1edd0add70..f0069a4adbbf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c >> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static const struct flash_info >> gigadevice_nor_parts[] = { >> }, { >> .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x40, 0x19), >> .name = "gd25q256", >> + .size = SZ_32M, > > Hi, just for my understanding, why this change? > > If it is a fix, should it be done a separate patch? > Or should it be mentioned in the commit description? > > CJ > >> .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB | >> SPI_NOR_TB_SR_BIT6, >> .fixups = &gd25q256_fixups, >> .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, >> @@ -82,6 +83,48 @@ static const struct flash_info >> gigadevice_nor_parts[] = { >> .size = SZ_16M, >> .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB, >> .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | >> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, >> + }, { >> + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x60, 0x19), >> + .name = "gd25lq255", >> + .size = SZ_32M, >> + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, >> + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | >> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, >> + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, >> + }, { >> + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x19), >> + .name = "gd25lb256", >> + .size = SZ_32M, >> + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, >> + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | >> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, >> + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, >> + }, { >> + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x1a), >> + .name = "gd25lb512m", >> + .size = SZ_64M, >> + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, >> + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | >> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, >> + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, >> + }, { >> + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x47, 0x1a), >> + .name = "gd25b512m", >> + .size = SZ_64M, >> + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, >> + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | >> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, >> + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, >> + }, { >> + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x47, 0x1b), >> + .name = "gd55b01ge", >> + .size = SZ_128M, >> + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, >> + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | >> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, >> + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, >> + }, { >> + .id = SNOR_ID(0xc8, 0x67, 0x1b), >> + .name = "gd55lb01ge", >> + .size = SZ_128M, >> + .flags = SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK, >> + .no_sfdp_flags = SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | >> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ, >> + .fixup_flags = SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES, >> }, >> }; > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ Hi Christophe, It definitely miss the .size field for gd25q256, I will send one separated patch for this. Best Regards,
Best Regards
Hi, On Sat Sep 7, 2024 at 9:04 AM CEST, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 07/09/2024 à 08:32, Renjun Wang a écrit : > > Add support for gd25lq255, gd25lb256, gd25lb512m, gd25b512m, gd55b01ge > > and gd55lb01ge. All these chips are tested on Rockchip boards[1]. > > > > [1]https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-5.10/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/gigadevice.c That's even older. Sorry but no. Have you checked that these flashes doesn't have SFDP tables? -michael
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.