fix 'task_strcut' to 'task_struct'

Signed-off-by: Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com>
---
 kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index cbae8c0b8..82d19846e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
 		 * checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
 		 * disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
 		 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the
-		 * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
+		 * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
 		 * period
 		 */
 		barrier();
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
 
 	/*
 	 * We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
-	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
+	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct
 	 * structure won't go away during the spinning period.
 	 */
 	owner = __mutex_owner(lock);
-- 
2.41.0

* Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com> wrote:

> fix 'task_strcut' to 'task_struct'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuu Lee <379943137@qq.com>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> index cbae8c0b8..82d19846e 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
>  		 * checking lock->owner still matches owner. And we already
>  		 * disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
>  		 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the
> -		 * task_strcut structure won't go away during the spinning
> +		 * task_struct structure won't go away during the spinning
>  		 * period
>  		 */
>  		barrier();
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We already disabled preemption which is equal to the RCU read-side
> -	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_strcut
> +	 * crital section in optimistic spinning code. Thus the task_struct
>  	 * structure won't go away during the spinning period.

There's another typo here, which you might as well fix?

Thanks,

	Ingo