When using the TEST_HARNESS_MAIN macro definition to declare the main
function, you need to use the EXPECT_ and ASSERT_ series of functions in
conjunction. Otherwise, even if a test item fails, the test will still
return a success result.

When adding a delay in waiterfn to artificially create an incorrect test
result, the test item has actually failed. However, the output still
indicates that the test has passed:

TAP version 13
1..2
 Starting 2 tests from 1 test cases.
  RUN           global.requeue_single ...
not ok 1 futex_requeue simple returned: 0
not ok 2 futex_requeue simple returned: 0
            OK  global.requeue_single
ok 1 global.requeue_single
  RUN           global.requeue_multiple ...
not ok 2 futex_requeue many returned: 0 Success
not ok 3 futex_requeue many returned: 0 Success
            OK  global.requeue_multiple
ok 2 global.requeue_multiple
 PASSED: 2 / 2 tests passed.
 Totals: pass:2 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

Fixes: f341a20f6d7e ("selftests/futex: Refactor futex_requeue with kselftest_harness.h")
Signed-off-by: Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@foxmail.com>
---
 .../futex/functional/futex_requeue.c          | 47 ++++---------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
index a9d96105134d0..b468411386dd5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_requeue.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ TEST(requeue_single)
 	volatile futex_t f2 = 0;
 	pthread_t waiter[10];
 	atomic_int tid = 0;
-	int res, state, retry = 100;
+	int state, retry = 100;
 
 	f1 = &_f1;
 	pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
@@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ TEST(requeue_single)
 	/*
 	 * Requeue a waiter from f1 to f2, and wake f2.
 	 */
-	if (pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiterfn, &tid))
-		ksft_exit_fail_msg("pthread_create failed\n");
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&waiter[0], NULL, waiterfn, &tid));
 
 	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
 	pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
@@ -82,22 +81,8 @@ TEST(requeue_single)
 			break;
 	}
 
-	ksft_print_dbg_msg("Requeuing 1 futex from f1 to f2\n");
-	res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 0, 1, 0);
-	if (res != 1)
-		ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue simple returned: %d %s\n",
-				      res ? errno : res,
-				      res ? strerror(errno) : "");
-
-	ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking 1 futex at f2\n");
-	res = futex_wake(&f2, 1, 0);
-	if (res != 1) {
-		ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue simple returned: %d %s\n",
-				      res ? errno : res,
-				      res ? strerror(errno) : "");
-	} else {
-		ksft_test_result_pass("futex_requeue simple succeeds\n");
-	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 0, 1, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(1, futex_wake(&f2, 1, 0));
 }
 
 TEST(requeue_multiple)
@@ -106,7 +91,7 @@ TEST(requeue_multiple)
 	volatile futex_t f2 = 0;
 	pthread_t waiter[10];
 	atomic_int tids[10] = {0};
-	int res, i, state, retry = 0;
+	int i, state, retry = 0;
 
 	f1 = &_f1;
 
@@ -117,8 +102,7 @@ TEST(requeue_multiple)
 	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
 		pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
 
-		if (pthread_create(&waiter[i], NULL, waiterfn, &tids[i]))
-			ksft_exit_fail_msg("pthread_create failed\n");
+		ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&waiter[i], NULL, waiterfn, &tids[i]));
 
 		pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
 		pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
@@ -132,23 +116,8 @@ TEST(requeue_multiple)
 		}
 	}
 
-	ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking 3 futexes at f1 and requeuing 7 futexes from f1 to f2\n");
-	res = futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 3, 7, 0);
-	if (res != 10) {
-		ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue many returned: %d %s\n",
-				      res ? errno : res,
-				      res ? strerror(errno) : "");
-	}
-
-	ksft_print_dbg_msg("Waking INT_MAX futexes at f2\n");
-	res = futex_wake(&f2, INT_MAX, 0);
-	if (res != 7) {
-		ksft_test_result_fail("futex_requeue many returned: %d %s\n",
-				      res ? errno : res,
-				      res ? strerror(errno) : "");
-	} else {
-		ksft_test_result_pass("futex_requeue many succeeds\n");
-	}
+	EXPECT_EQ(10, futex_cmp_requeue(f1, 0, &f2, 3, 7, 0));
+	EXPECT_EQ(7, futex_wake(&f2, INT_MAX, 0));
 }
 
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, Jan 27 2026 at 15:37, Yuwen Chen wrote:
> When using the TEST_HARNESS_MAIN macro definition to declare the main
> function, you need to use the EXPECT_ and ASSERT_ series of functions in
> conjunction. Otherwise, even if a test item fails, the test will still
> return a success result.
>
> When adding a delay in waiterfn to artificially create an incorrect test
> result, the test item has actually failed. However, the output still
> indicates that the test has passed:

This is an actual fix and wants to go _before_ adding hacks to solve the
my system is too busy to start a thread in 10 seconds "problem".

Thanks,

        tglx

On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 19:35:19 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This is an actual fix and wants to go _before_ adding hacks to solve the
> my system is too busy to start a thread in 10 seconds "problem".
> 
> Thanks,
>
>         tglx

Thank you very much for your reply. I've resubmitted a new patch.