staging: r8188eu: fix a potential memory leak in rtw_init_cmd_priv()

[PATCH v6] staging: r8188eu: fix a potential memory leak in rtw_init_cmd_priv()

Posted by xkernel.wang@foxmail.com 3 years, 7 months ago

From: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>

In rtw_init_cmd_priv(), if `pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf` is allocated
in failure, then `pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf` will not be properly
released. Besides, considering there are only two error paths and the
first one can directly return, we do not need to implicitly jump to the
`exit` tag to execute the error handling code.

So this patch added `kfree(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf);` on the error
path to release the resource and simplified the return logic of
rtw_init_cmd_priv(). As there is no proper device to test with, no
runtime testing was performed.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>
---
ChangeLog:
v1->v2: simplify the function.
v2->v3: rebase and recover some whitespace cleanups.
v3->v4: update the description.
v4->v5: rebase...
v5->v6: update the description.
 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
index 9c700ff..e38a826 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static int _rtw_enqueue_cmd(struct __queue *queue, struct cmd_obj *obj)
 
 u32	rtw_init_cmd_priv(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv)
 {
-	u32 res = _SUCCESS;
-
 	init_completion(&pcmdpriv->enqueue_cmd);
 	/* sema_init(&(pcmdpriv->cmd_done_sema), 0); */
 	init_completion(&pcmdpriv->start_cmd_thread);
@@ -74,27 +72,24 @@ u32	rtw_init_cmd_priv(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv)
 	pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf = kzalloc(MAX_CMDSZ + CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ,
 					      GFP_KERNEL);
 
-	if (!pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf) {
-		res = _FAIL;
-		goto exit;
-	}
+	if (!pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf)
+		return _FAIL;
 
 	pcmdpriv->cmd_buf = pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf  +  CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ - ((size_t)(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf) & (CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ - 1));
 
 	pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf = kzalloc(MAX_RSPSZ + 4, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (!pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf) {
-		res = _FAIL;
-		goto exit;
+		kfree(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf);
+		return _FAIL;
 	}
 
 	pcmdpriv->rsp_buf = pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf  +  4 - ((size_t)(pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf) & 3);
 
 	pcmdpriv->cmd_done_cnt = 0;
 	pcmdpriv->rsp_cnt = 0;
-exit:
 
-	return res;
+	return _SUCCESS;
 }
 
 u32 rtw_init_evt_priv(struct evt_priv *pevtpriv)
--

Re: [PATCH v6] staging: r8188eu: fix a potential memory leak in rtw_init_cmd_priv()

Posted by philipp hortmann 3 years, 6 months ago

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 07:45:57PM +0800, xkernel.wang@foxmail.com wrote:
> From: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>
> 
> In rtw_init_cmd_priv(), if `pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf` is allocated
> in failure, then `pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf` will not be properly
> released. Besides, considering there are only two error paths and the
> first one can directly return, we do not need to implicitly jump to the
> `exit` tag to execute the error handling code.
> 
> So this patch added `kfree(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf);` on the error
> path to release the resource and simplified the return logic of
> rtw_init_cmd_priv(). As there is no proper device to test with, no
> runtime testing was performed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>
> ---
> ChangeLog:
> v1->v2: simplify the function.
> v2->v3: rebase and recover some whitespace cleanups.
> v3->v4: update the description.
> v4->v5: rebase...
> v5->v6: update the description.
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
> index 9c700ff..e38a826 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
> @@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ static int _rtw_enqueue_cmd(struct __queue *queue, struct cmd_obj *obj)
>  
>  u32	rtw_init_cmd_priv(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv)
>  {
> -	u32 res = _SUCCESS;
> -
>  	init_completion(&pcmdpriv->enqueue_cmd);
>  	/* sema_init(&(pcmdpriv->cmd_done_sema), 0); */
>  	init_completion(&pcmdpriv->start_cmd_thread);
> @@ -74,27 +72,24 @@ u32	rtw_init_cmd_priv(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv)
>  	pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf = kzalloc(MAX_CMDSZ + CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ,
>  					      GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> -	if (!pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf) {
> -		res = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> -	}
> +	if (!pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf)
> +		return _FAIL;
>  
>  	pcmdpriv->cmd_buf = pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf  +  CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ - ((size_t)(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf) & (CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ - 1));
>  
>  	pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf = kzalloc(MAX_RSPSZ + 4, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	if (!pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf) {
> -		res = _FAIL;
> -		goto exit;
> +		kfree(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf);
> +		return _FAIL;
>  	}
>  
>  	pcmdpriv->rsp_buf = pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf  +  4 - ((size_t)(pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf) & 3);
>  
>  	pcmdpriv->cmd_done_cnt = 0;
>  	pcmdpriv->rsp_cnt = 0;
> -exit:
>  
> -	return res;
> +	return _SUCCESS;
>  }
>  
>  u32 rtw_init_evt_priv(struct evt_priv *pevtpriv)
> --

Tested-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com> # Edimax N150