tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/test_smoke.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Use POSIX-conformant operator symbol '='.
Signed-off-by: Ahmed Salem <x0rw3ll@gmail.com>
---
Apologies for my previous mistakes.
Changes in v3:
- Reword mistaken commit message
Changes in v2:
- Remove snippets pinpointing the issue
from commit message
tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/test_smoke.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/test_smoke.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/test_smoke.sh
index 168f4b166234..3a60e6c6f5c9 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/test_smoke.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/test_smoke.sh
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ ksft_skip=4
[ -e /dev/tpm0 ] || exit $ksft_skip
read tpm_version < /sys/class/tpm/tpm0/tpm_version_major
-[ "$tpm_version" == 2 ] || exit $ksft_skip
+[ "$tpm_version" = 2 ] || exit $ksft_skip
python3 -m unittest -v tpm2_tests.SmokeTest 2>&1
--
2.47.2
On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 5:00 AM EET, Ahmed Salem wrote: > Use POSIX-conformant operator symbol '='. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Salem <x0rw3ll@gmail.com> > --- > > Apologies for my previous mistakes. > > Changes in v3: > - Reword mistaken commit message > > Changes in v2: > - Remove snippets pinpointing the issue > from commit message OK I read what I wrote and I guess it could have been misinterpreted. What I meant was to take the relevant part of the transcript that shows the issue (and possibly also how it works when fixed). Sorry about that. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/D7OY3ZVGJOV5.R3SL9SBFT2DF@kernel.org/ BR, Jarkko
On 25/02/11 08:10PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 5:00 AM EET, Ahmed Salem wrote: > > Use POSIX-conformant operator symbol '='. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Salem <x0rw3ll@gmail.com> > > --- > > > > Apologies for my previous mistakes. > > > > Changes in v3: > > - Reword mistaken commit message > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Remove snippets pinpointing the issue > > from commit message > > OK I read what I wrote and I guess it could have been misinterpreted. > > What I meant was to take the relevant part of the transcript that shows > the issue (and possibly also how it works when fixed). > > Sorry about that. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/D7OY3ZVGJOV5.R3SL9SBFT2DF@kernel.org/ > > BR, Jarkko Understood. Thank you so much for your review and continued guidance! I will be sending the revised patch shortly with the proposed changes. -- Best regards, Ahmed Salem <x0rw3ll@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 01:05:02AM +0200, Ahmed Salem wrote: > On 25/02/11 08:10PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 5:00 AM EET, Ahmed Salem wrote: > > > Use POSIX-conformant operator symbol '='. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Salem <x0rw3ll@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > > > > Apologies for my previous mistakes. > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - Reword mistaken commit message > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > - Remove snippets pinpointing the issue > > > from commit message > > > > OK I read what I wrote and I guess it could have been misinterpreted. > > > > What I meant was to take the relevant part of the transcript that shows > > the issue (and possibly also how it works when fixed). > > > > Sorry about that. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/D7OY3ZVGJOV5.R3SL9SBFT2DF@kernel.org/ > > > > BR, Jarkko > > Understood. Thank you so much for your review and continued guidance! > > I will be sending the revised patch shortly with the proposed changes. Yeah, like narrow down the transcript that's all, and yep what I said was somewhat misguiding... BR, Jarkko
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.