[PATCH next] optee: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check

Dan Carpenter posted 1 patch 1 year, 5 months ago
drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH next] optee: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check
Posted by Dan Carpenter 1 year, 5 months ago
The tee_shm_get_va() function never returns NULL, it returns error
pointers.  Update the check to match.

Fixes: f0c8431568ee ("optee: probe RPMB device using RPMB subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
index a4b49fd1d46d..ebbbd42b0e3e 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_rpmb_probe_next(struct tee_context *ctx,
 	}
 	buf = tee_shm_get_va(params[1].u.memref.shm,
 			     params[1].u.memref.shm_offs);
-	if (!buf) {
+	if (IS_ERR(buf)) {
 		arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH next] optee: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check
Posted by Jens Wiklander 1 year, 5 months ago
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:17 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The tee_shm_get_va() function never returns NULL, it returns error
> pointers.  Update the check to match.
>
> Fixes: f0c8431568ee ("optee: probe RPMB device using RPMB subsystem")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> index a4b49fd1d46d..ebbbd42b0e3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_rpmb_probe_next(struct tee_context *ctx,
>         }
>         buf = tee_shm_get_va(params[1].u.memref.shm,
>                              params[1].u.memref.shm_offs);
> -       if (!buf) {
> +       if (IS_ERR(buf)) {
>                 arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
>                 return;
>         }
> --
> 2.45.2
>

Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>

Ulf, this is a fix for a patch in your next tree so if you could pick
up this patch, please.

Thanks,
Jens
Re: [PATCH next] optee: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check
Posted by Ulf Hansson 1 year, 5 months ago
On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 16:09, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:17 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > The tee_shm_get_va() function never returns NULL, it returns error
> > pointers.  Update the check to match.
> >
> > Fixes: f0c8431568ee ("optee: probe RPMB device using RPMB subsystem")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> > index a4b49fd1d46d..ebbbd42b0e3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> > @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_rpmb_probe_next(struct tee_context *ctx,
> >         }
> >         buf = tee_shm_get_va(params[1].u.memref.shm,
> >                              params[1].u.memref.shm_offs);
> > -       if (!buf) {
> > +       if (IS_ERR(buf)) {
> >                 arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> >                 return;
> >         }
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
>
> Good catch.
> Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
>
> Ulf, this is a fix for a patch in your next tree so if you could pick
> up this patch, please.
>
> Thanks,
> Jens

Patch applied to the next branch to my mmc tree, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe