drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
In ns83820_init_one, &dev->tq_refill is bound with queue_refill, and
ns83820_rx_kick can schedule this work on system_wq when it is called
from the IRQ handler ns83820_irq (via ns83820_do_isr) or from the rx
tasklet rx_action.
If we remove the device, ns83820_remove_one makes cleanup and the
memory allocated for dev with netdev_priv() is released by
free_netdev(), while the work mentioned above may still be pending or
running. The sequence of operations that may lead to a UAF bug is as
follows:
CPU0 CPU1
| ns83820_irq
| ns83820_do_isr
| ns83820_rx_kick
| schedule_work(&dev->tq_refill)
ns83820_remove_one |
ns83820_disable_interrupts(dev) |
unregister_netdev(ndev) |
free_irq(dev->pci_dev->irq, ndev) |
iounmap(dev->base) |
dma_free_coherent(...) |
free_netdev(ndev) |
// dev is freed |
| queue_refill
| // use dev (use-after-free)
free_irq() only prevents the IRQ handler from running again. An rx
tasklet that was already scheduled by a previous interrupt can still
run afterwards, and rx_action calls ns83820_rx_kick, which can
re-schedule tq_refill on system_wq. This leaves a window where
queue_refill can still run after free_netdev() has freed dev.
Fix it by stopping the sources that can schedule the work, in order:
unregister_netdev() and free_irq() stop the IRQ handler, tasklet_kill()
waits for the rx tasklet to finish, and cancel_work_sync() then drains
any work that was queued before proceeding with the remaining cleanup
in ns83820_remove_one.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Assisted-by: Codex:deepseek-v4-flash
Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
---
changes in v2: add tasklet_kill
---
drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
index cdbf82affa7b..022fe0d29cb8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/ns83820.c
@@ -2209,6 +2209,10 @@ static void ns83820_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
unregister_netdev(ndev);
free_irq(dev->pci_dev->irq, ndev);
+
+ tasklet_kill(&dev->rx_tasklet);
+ cancel_work_sync(&dev->tq_refill);
+
iounmap(dev->base);
dma_free_coherent(&dev->pci_dev->dev, 4 * DESC_SIZE * NR_TX_DESC,
dev->tx_descs, dev->tx_phy_descs);
--
2.25.1
On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:51:47 +0800 Pei Xiao wrote: > Subject: [PATCH v2] net: natsemi: ns83820: Fix use-after-free in ns83820_remove_one due to race condition Please stop sending those pointless fixes to long unused drivers.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 10:51:47AM +0800, Pei Xiao wrote: > In ns83820_init_one, &dev->tq_refill is bound with queue_refill, and > ns83820_rx_kick can schedule this work on system_wq when it is called > from the IRQ handler ns83820_irq (via ns83820_do_isr) or from the rx > tasklet rx_action. > > If we remove the device, ns83820_remove_one makes cleanup and the > memory allocated for dev with netdev_priv() is released by > free_netdev(), while the work mentioned above may still be pending or > running. The sequence of operations that may lead to a UAF bug is as > follows: > > CPU0 CPU1 > > | ns83820_irq > | ns83820_do_isr > | ns83820_rx_kick > | schedule_work(&dev->tq_refill) > ns83820_remove_one | > ns83820_disable_interrupts(dev) | > unregister_netdev(ndev) | > free_irq(dev->pci_dev->irq, ndev) | > iounmap(dev->base) | > dma_free_coherent(...) | > free_netdev(ndev) | > // dev is freed | > | queue_refill > | // use dev (use-after-free) > > free_irq() only prevents the IRQ handler from running again. An rx > tasklet that was already scheduled by a previous interrupt can still > run afterwards, and rx_action calls ns83820_rx_kick, which can > re-schedule tq_refill on system_wq. This leaves a window where > queue_refill can still run after free_netdev() has freed dev. > > Fix it by stopping the sources that can schedule the work, in order: > unregister_netdev() and free_irq() stop the IRQ handler, tasklet_kill() > waits for the rx tasklet to finish, and cancel_work_sync() then drains > any work that was queued before proceeding with the remaining cleanup > in ns83820_remove_one. Is this change tested in any way? Andrew
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.