crypto/rng.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:45:13 +0100
A bit of data was put into a sequence by two separate function calls.
Print the same data by a single function call instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
crypto/rng.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/rng.c b/crypto/rng.c
index ee1768c5a400..479c4ac6fb6c 100644
--- a/crypto/rng.c
+++ b/crypto/rng.c
@@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ static void crypto_rng_show(struct seq_file *m, struct crypto_alg *alg)
__maybe_unused;
static void crypto_rng_show(struct seq_file *m, struct crypto_alg *alg)
{
- seq_printf(m, "type : rng\n");
- seq_printf(m, "seedsize : %u\n", seedsize(alg));
+ seq_printf(m, "type : rng\nseedsize : %u\n", seedsize(alg));
}
static const struct crypto_type crypto_rng_type = {
--
2.51.1
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 04:56:10PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:45:13 +0100
>
> A bit of data was put into a sequence by two separate function calls.
> Print the same data by a single function call instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> crypto/rng.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/rng.c b/crypto/rng.c
> index ee1768c5a400..479c4ac6fb6c 100644
> --- a/crypto/rng.c
> +++ b/crypto/rng.c
> @@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ static void crypto_rng_show(struct seq_file *m, struct crypto_alg *alg)
> __maybe_unused;
> static void crypto_rng_show(struct seq_file *m, struct crypto_alg *alg)
> {
> - seq_printf(m, "type : rng\n");
> - seq_printf(m, "seedsize : %u\n", seedsize(alg));
> + seq_printf(m, "type : rng\nseedsize : %u\n", seedsize(alg));
This makes the code look worse and appears to be an optimisation
that isn't really needed.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
…>> +++ b/crypto/rng.c
>> @@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ static void crypto_rng_show(struct seq_file *m, struct crypto_alg *alg)
>> __maybe_unused;
>> static void crypto_rng_show(struct seq_file *m, struct crypto_alg *alg)
>> {
>> - seq_printf(m, "type : rng\n");
>> - seq_printf(m, "seedsize : %u\n", seedsize(alg));
>> + seq_printf(m, "type : rng\nseedsize : %u\n", seedsize(alg));
>
> This makes the code look worse and appears to be an optimisation
> that isn't really needed.
Would you expect to specify still two string literals at such a source code place?
Regards,
Markus
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.