From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Introduce sched_cache_present to enable cache aware scheduling for
multi LLCs NUMA node Cache-aware load balancing should only be
enabled if there are more than 1 LLCs within 1 NUMA node.
sched_cache_present is introduced to indicate whether this
platform supports this topology.
Test results:
The first test platform is a 2 socket Intel Sapphire Rapids with 30
cores per socket. The DRAM interleaving is enabled in the BIOS so it
essential has one NUMA node with two last level caches. There are 60
CPUs associated with each last level cache.
The second test platform is a AMD Genoa. There are 4 Nodes and 32 CPUs
per node. Each node has 2 CCXs and each CCX has 16 CPUs.
hackbench/schbench/netperf/stream/stress-ng/chacha20 were launched
on these two platforms.
[TL;DR]
Sappire Rapids:
hackbench shows significant improvement when the number of
different active threads is below the capacity of a LLC.
schbench shows limitted wakeup latency improvement.
ChaCha20-xiangshan(risc-v simulator) shows good throughput
improvement. No obvious difference was observed in
netperf/stream/stress-ng in Hmean.
Genoa:
Significant improvement is observed in hackbench when
the active number of threads is lower than the number
of CPUs within 1 LLC. On v2, Aaron reported improvement
of hackbench/redis when system is underloaded.
ChaCha20-xiangshan shows huge throughput improvement.
Phoronix has tested v1 and shows good improvements in 30+
cases[3]. No obvious difference was observed in
netperf/stream/stress-ng in Hmean.
Detail:
Due to length constraints, data without much difference with
baseline is not presented.
Sapphire Rapids:
[hackbench pipe]
================
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
threads-pipe-10 1-groups 1.00 ( 1.22) +26.09 ( 1.10)
threads-pipe-10 2-groups 1.00 ( 4.90) +22.88 ( 0.18)
threads-pipe-10 4-groups 1.00 ( 2.07) +9.00 ( 3.49)
threads-pipe-10 8-groups 1.00 ( 8.13) +3.45 ( 3.62)
threads-pipe-16 1-groups 1.00 ( 2.11) +26.30 ( 0.08)
threads-pipe-16 2-groups 1.00 ( 15.13) -1.77 ( 11.89)
threads-pipe-16 4-groups 1.00 ( 4.37) +0.58 ( 7.99)
threads-pipe-16 8-groups 1.00 ( 2.88) +2.71 ( 3.50)
threads-pipe-2 1-groups 1.00 ( 9.40) +22.07 ( 0.71)
threads-pipe-2 2-groups 1.00 ( 9.99) +18.01 ( 0.95)
threads-pipe-2 4-groups 1.00 ( 3.98) +24.66 ( 0.96)
threads-pipe-2 8-groups 1.00 ( 7.00) +21.83 ( 0.23)
threads-pipe-20 1-groups 1.00 ( 1.03) +28.84 ( 0.21)
threads-pipe-20 2-groups 1.00 ( 4.42) +31.90 ( 3.15)
threads-pipe-20 4-groups 1.00 ( 9.97) +4.56 ( 1.69)
threads-pipe-20 8-groups 1.00 ( 1.87) +1.25 ( 0.74)
threads-pipe-4 1-groups 1.00 ( 4.48) +25.67 ( 0.78)
threads-pipe-4 2-groups 1.00 ( 9.14) +4.91 ( 2.08)
threads-pipe-4 4-groups 1.00 ( 7.68) +19.36 ( 1.53)
threads-pipe-4 8-groups 1.00 ( 10.79) +7.20 ( 12.20)
threads-pipe-8 1-groups 1.00 ( 4.69) +21.93 ( 0.03)
threads-pipe-8 2-groups 1.00 ( 1.16) +25.29 ( 0.65)
threads-pipe-8 4-groups 1.00 ( 2.23) -1.27 ( 3.62)
threads-pipe-8 8-groups 1.00 ( 4.65) -3.08 ( 2.75)
Note: The default number of fd in hackbench is changed from 20 to various
values to ensure that threads fit within a single LLC, especially on AMD
systems. Take "threads-pipe-8, 2-groups" for example, the number of fd
is 8, and 2 groups are created.
[schbench]
The 99th percentile wakeup latency shows some improvements when the
system is underload, while it does not bring much difference with
the increasing of system utilization.
99th Wakeup Latencies Base (mean std) Compare (mean std) Change
=========================================================================
thread=2 9.00(0.00) 9.00(1.73) 0.00%
thread=4 7.33(0.58) 6.33(0.58) +13.64%
thread=8 9.00(0.00) 7.67(1.15) +14.78%
thread=16 8.67(0.58) 8.67(1.53) 0.00%
thread=32 9.00(0.00) 7.00(0.00) +22.22%
thread=64 9.33(0.58) 9.67(0.58) -3.64%
thread=128 12.00(0.00) 12.00(0.00) 0.00%
[chacha20 on simulated risc-v]
baseline:
Host time spent: 67861ms
cache aware scheduling enabled:
Host time spent: 54441ms
Time reduced by 24%
Genoa:
[hackbench pipe]
The default number of fd is 20, which exceed the number of CPUs
in a LLC. So the fd is adjusted to 2, 4, 6, 8, 20 respectively.
Exclude the result with large run-to-run variance, 10% ~ 50%
improvement is observed when the system is underloaded:
[hackbench pipe]
================
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
threads-pipe-2 1-groups 1.00 ( 2.89) +47.33 ( 1.20)
threads-pipe-2 2-groups 1.00 ( 3.88) +39.82 ( 0.61)
threads-pipe-2 4-groups 1.00 ( 8.76) +5.57 ( 13.10)
threads-pipe-20 1-groups 1.00 ( 4.61) +11.72 ( 1.06)
threads-pipe-20 2-groups 1.00 ( 6.18) +14.55 ( 1.47)
threads-pipe-20 4-groups 1.00 ( 2.99) +10.16 ( 4.49)
threads-pipe-4 1-groups 1.00 ( 4.23) +43.70 ( 2.14)
threads-pipe-4 2-groups 1.00 ( 3.68) +8.45 ( 4.04)
threads-pipe-4 4-groups 1.00 ( 17.72) +2.42 ( 1.14)
threads-pipe-6 1-groups 1.00 ( 3.10) +7.74 ( 3.83)
threads-pipe-6 2-groups 1.00 ( 3.42) +14.26 ( 4.53)
threads-pipe-6 4-groups 1.00 ( 10.34) +10.94 ( 7.12)
threads-pipe-8 1-groups 1.00 ( 4.21) +9.06 ( 4.43)
threads-pipe-8 2-groups 1.00 ( 1.88) +3.74 ( 0.58)
threads-pipe-8 4-groups 1.00 ( 2.78) +23.96 ( 1.18)
[chacha20 on simulated risc-v]
Host time spent: 54762ms
Host time spent: 28295ms
Time reduced by 48%
Suggested-by: Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>
Suggested-by: Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
Notes:
v3->v4:
Add test results into commit log.
kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +++-
kernel/sched/topology.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 511c85572b96..518c798231ac 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -4035,9 +4035,11 @@ static inline void mm_cid_switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct
#endif /* !CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID */
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cache_present);
+
static inline bool sched_cache_enabled(void)
{
- return false;
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cache_present);
}
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 995a42cb4697..0b1fc1b0709d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ enum s_alloc {
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cache_present);
static bool alloc_sd_llc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
struct s_data *d)
{
@@ -2674,6 +2675,7 @@ static int
build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *attr)
{
enum s_alloc alloc_state = sa_none;
+ bool has_multi_llcs = false;
struct sched_domain *sd;
struct s_data d;
struct rq *rq = NULL;
@@ -2784,10 +2786,12 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
* between LLCs and memory channels.
*/
nr_llcs = sd->span_weight / child->span_weight;
- if (nr_llcs == 1)
+ if (nr_llcs == 1) {
imb = sd->span_weight >> 3;
- else
+ } else {
imb = nr_llcs;
+ has_multi_llcs = true;
+ }
imb = max(1U, imb);
sd->imb_numa_nr = imb;
@@ -2842,6 +2846,16 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
ret = 0;
error:
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
+ /*
+ * TBD: check before writing to it. sched domain rebuild
+ * is not in the critical path, leave as-is for now.
+ */
+ if (!ret && has_multi_llcs)
+ static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&sched_cache_present);
+ else
+ static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&sched_cache_present);
+#endif
__free_domain_allocs(&d, alloc_state, cpu_map);
return ret;
--
2.32.0